Congress, White House Reach Tentative Agreement on Bailout

2008_09_pelpa.jpg

Early this morning, lawmakers announced that they had agreed on a tentative plan to bailout financial firms. The Wall Street Journal reported an "exhausted" Treasury Secretary as saying, "I think we're there," during a press conference with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Senator Christopher Dodd, and House FInancial Services Chairman Barney Frank--all top Democrats. Pelosi said, "We've made great progress. We have to get it committed to paper so that we can formally agree."

Representative Roy Blunt (R-Ohio) was guarded, though optimistic, "I look forward to what we're going to see on paper and presenting these ideas to my colleagues and getting their reaction." Here are some details about the plan, via the NY Times:

The bill includes pay limits for some executives whose firms seek help, aides said. And it requires the government to use its new role as owner of distressed mortgage-backed securities to make more aggressive efforts to prevent home foreclosures.

In some cases, the government would receive an equity stake in companies that seek aid, allowing taxpayers to profit should the rescue plan work and the private firms flourish in the months and years ahead.

The White House also agreed to strict oversight of the program by a Congressional panel and conflict-of-interest rules for firms hired by the Treasury to help run the program.

The administration had initially requested virtually unfettered authority to operate the bailout program. But as they moved toward clinching a deal, both sides appeared to have given up a number of contentious proposals, including a change in the bankruptcy laws sought by some Democrats to give judges the authority to modify the terms of first mortgages.

House Republicans managed to get a provision for the Treasury Department "to create a federal insurance program that would guarantee banks and other firms against loss from any troubled asset," according to an official who spoke to the Washington Post.

Senator Judd Gregg (R-NH), who had approved the initial agreement that House Republicans blasted last week, said, "We worked out everything," but that Senate Republicans want to see to the bill. And Senator Bob Kerrey that voters "don't want a bailout of Wall Street and neither do we. What we are talking about is not losing 3 million jobs in a matter of weeks [and helping] small banks and small businesses literally keeping their doors open."

The Wall Street Journal has a fascinating article about how the negotiations fell apart last week--with Senator McCain at the center. And Dealbreaker has the draft of the plan, via Pelosi's office.

Email This Entry


Comments (6) [rss]

Ouch. $700B is roughly $4500 per taxpayer. The average American would need to work for 13 days and pay 100% of the income to the U.S. government to generate that money.

In reality the government will just print more money and/or add the amount to the U.S. federal deficit - which is now $10.4 Trillion (it was less than $4 Trillion in 2000).

If I weren't already super-cynical I'd be pretty pissed about this.

It is true that the $700B is going to be "printed" money, but its application is even more problematical: it will be used to reinflate the stock and real estate markets, which will almost certainly lead to even larger bubbles and an even larger crash in the not-to-distant future.

There is also another shoe in the present set to drop, and that is whether the Chinese and others who have been funding the present regime are going to continue in their role as suckers. They've been hanging in there so far, but even Asian patience must have its limits.

Guess it's time to buy gold bricks, get some chickens for the yard, and an AK-47 to hang over the fireplace.


eisenhut2000 - I think the average American would need to work more than 13 days to earn $4500.

"One thing is certain. No one - no politician, no investment banker, no television commentator, no economist - should be able to say again with a straight face that here in the United States we just let markets do whatever markets do and everything works out for the best." - AFL-CIO's President John Sweeney

Maybe for once Washington will run Wall Street, instead of the other way around.

user-pic

Government owning mortgages, government owning and profiting from companies, government dictating salaries... Can someone tag this story as "communism"??

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

Get your daily dose of New York first thing in the morning from our weekday newsletter, now in beta.

About Gothamist

Gothamist is a website about New York. More

Editor: Jen Chung
Publisher: Jake Dobkin

Newsmap

newsmap.jpg

Contribute

Latest Tip:

Symphonic rock comes to Manhattan in December! Seann Branchfield and the Unnamed Band performing De
[more]

Latest Photo:

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Gothamist.

All Our RSS

Follow us