<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: NY Times Sections to Consolidate</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php</link>
<description>All comments for NY Times Sections to Consolidate</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:07:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jen@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jen@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Future Taliban</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1455446</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1455446</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 22:01:33 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Please. If I need to know the real facts I&apos;d rather read Pravda.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>dooWOP</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1455402</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1455402</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:57:07 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;What a crap newspaper this has evolved into in recent years - it&apos;s a wonder they have a sustainable circulation at all. Perhaps, I&apos;m just getting wiser as time goes by...?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Mr Mel</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1455270</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1455270</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:30:39 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It makes sense. Lately there have been 4 page Metro sections &amp; 5 page sports sections. Merging sections is the right way to  conserve paper, ink, weight and gas.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Rfive</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1455213</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1455213</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:52:49 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;where did you see that benji?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>benji</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1455110</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1455110</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:58:24 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;@thenebula - perhaps this would put some perspective on where the NYTimes gets most of their revenue...

&quot;Paul Krugman was observing that even though the political coverage is the part of the media that people like to talk about, it&apos;s actually fairly marginal to the business. The New York Times is known for its hard news coverage, but he observes that from a business perspective it&apos;s primarily a fashion and food publication that runs a small political news operation on the side. One issue of T Magazine, he says, pays for an entire NYT European bureau.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>nomnomnom</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1454980</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1454980</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:40:39 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;@thenebula - I suspect those wouldn&apos;t get cut because they attract advertisers to their niche content.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>thenebula</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1454948</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1454948</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:16:16 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Folding the Metro and Sports section into one is a better idea than the one they have floating around now.

If they want to save money, why don&apos;t they cut out those special sections no one reads like Style and Home on Thursdays.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>putch</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1454930</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1454930</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:59:14 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I seem to remember a time when metro and sports lived together in a single section.  Am I just hallucinating?  Why not just go back to that?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>handsomedevil</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1454926</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1454926</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:56:58 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, but I heard that that newspaper is, like, just a bunch of lies.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Chinkerfly</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1454914</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1454914</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:44:53 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Circulation may be down, but online presence is still on the up and up &quot;according to Nielsen Online, NYTimes.com had 19.5 million unique visitors in July versus 14.1 million in July 2007, up about 38%, and was the No. 1 newspaper Web site in the United States&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Toby von Meistersinger</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1454910</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/the_ny_times_sections_to_consolidat.php#comment-1454910</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:41:32 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;If you ever have seen an edition of The Times outside of the tri-state area it doesn&apos;t have a Metro Section. It could also be a move to standardize the various editions like the National and Washington into one unified edition.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>