Extra, Extra
Extra, Extra
Extra, Extra
Extra, Extra
Early Addition
This Friday brings good news, as Variety is reporting that the Ghostbusters are making their way back to the big screen. This isn't some thrown together, B-list, straight-to-DVD sequel, either. They say "the studio has set The Office co-exec producers Lee Eisenberg and Gene Stupnitsky to write a script for a film designed to bring back together the original cast of Harold Ramis, Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd and Ernie Hudson." No word on yet on whether or not they'll be going to hell in this one, but other rumors surrounding the third installment are running rampant.
NYMag points out that Dan Aykroyd alluded to Seth Rogen and Paul Rudd being two of the new 'Busters (in the storyline they'll be handed over 'Busting duties from the old guard), and he hopes to get Judd Apatow involved as well. Watch the video on E! where he discusses it--and until the new movie gets going, relive the old one. Here's a map of NYC's Ghostbuster landmarks, some questions answered about the filming of the original, and the trailer.
add to digg
add to stumble upon
add to reddit
email this
add to facebook
add to del.icio.us
There is also a video game coming out. (Hopefully will make up for the money my dad wasted buying me the NES game).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umMYQuuWozs
I want that game!
Hollywood is like the old American Indians....use every part of that freakin buffalo.
Remakes of classics are hardly ever "good news."
I don't care if God himself came down to make a new Ghostbusters movie.
Just leave the fucking old franchises alone, Hollywood.
I've heard that Andy Milonakis' name is attached to this project.
you said it, Jen S!
Leave rogen out of it. He ruins every movie he's in. They should bring Rick Moranis out of retirement instead.
Universal did the right thing and put both movies online for free: http://www.hulu.com/videos/search?query=Ghostbusters
While I'm a big Rogen & Rudd fan - any remake of Ghostbusters would suck. The original movie's energy came from NYC still being the Wild West in the early 80's. What would the premise be today?
I have mixed feelings about this. On one hand, I loved the original (the sequel stunk though, except for the Bobby Brown song) and would love to see the original four back together again with a solid script. Also, given the special effects the studios use today, the movie has potential to look fantastic.
That said, Dan Aykrod hasn't done anything remotely funny since the mid 80s, Bill Murray is now a minimalist actor (that's not a knock, it's just how he's matured) Ernie Hudson has been MIA since "The Hand That Rock's the Cradle" and Harold Ramis is more of a writer than actor now. I like Paul Rudd and Seth Rogen (to a lesser extent) but they don't have blockbuster appeal. I wouldn't want to see Ben Stiller or Will Ferrell, either.
What actors (or actresses) would be ideal cast members as the new generation?
good news?
Name one good franchise revisit.
That NES game was awesome.
To Jen S; and Zodak:
The movie isn't going to be a remake. It'll be somewhat of a sequel to the Ghostbusters "series".
But I agree, classics should be left alone and not make a re-make.
FYI -- The taking of Pelham 1,2,3 will be remade starring John Travolta and Denzel Washington, and was filmed in Toronto. Now, that's sacrilegious.
"FYI -- The taking of Pelham 1,2,3 will be remade starring John Travolta and Denzel Washington, and was filmed in Toronto. Now, that's sacrilegious."
Now that's what I call John Revolta. How about a redo of Saturday Night Fever shot in Trenton?
Rumor has it that Ben Stiller is involved too.
goddamnit aykroyd, just GIVE IT UP, PLEASE
13 - good point. But, are new prequels and sequels to classics ever good?
Please see: Star Wars, Indiana Jones
I'll admit that there are chance successes with remakes/prequels/sequels (See: Batman), but for the most part, the end result is a sad attempt to steal our money via nostalgia.
Best remake I think would have to be The Fly. Both versions 50s and 80s were pretty damn good. Cape Fear with Deniro was also a remake but I had to look that one up. (never saw the original.) The most recent King Kong was pretty decent as well. The Thing was another remake but of a movie that no one saw the original of. Mary Shelley's Frankenstein with Deniro was also very true to the book compared with the classic b&w one. Batman Begins was much better than 1989 batman (for me at least). I just found out the 1939 wizard of oz was a remake believe it or not, but I have no idea what the original was or how anyone would see it.
Next up for remakes: Birth of a Nation lol imagine that one.
Remakes are a dime a dozen in Hollywood. They just released one of Roger Corman's classic gore-fest Death Race 2000, and it unsurprisingly turns out to be hated by critics and audiences alike. They're also talking about a remade Robocop. Come December, Keanu Reeves is in a new The Day the Earth Stood Still, and the Keanu-haters (who are justifiably legion) are just lining up with jokes about how he's perfect to play an emotionless alien.
Put the damn thing on Broadway and be done with it.
I just love Mary Poppins remakes on Broadway. Also Rodgers and Hammerstein's musicals and all the other rehashed crap that Broadway does. Man of La Mancha anyone?
What ever happened to original ideas?
The other day, I saw a sign for a Shrek musical. AHH!