<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Is There a Future for Privatizing the City&apos;s Infrastructure?</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/08/28/is_there_a_future_for_privatizing_t.php</link>
<description>All comments for Is There a Future for Privatizing the City&apos;s Infrastructure?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:03:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jen@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jen@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>TSOL</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/08/28/is_there_a_future_for_privatizing_t.php#comment-1449151</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/08/28/is_there_a_future_for_privatizing_t.php#comment-1449151</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:23:13 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Initially, Roebling was met with cool reception by the city governments of New York and Brooklyn. He then approached William C. Kingsley, a Brooklyn businessman with political connections and publisher of the influential Brooklyn Eagle, who met the idea with enthusiasm. In turn, Kingsley enlisted the support of Henry Murphy, a state senator and former mayor of Brooklyn. Murphy then drafted a bill to the New York State Legislature that would enable a private company to build a bridge connecting Manhattan and Brooklyn.

In 1867, a group of prominent leaders formed the New York Bridge Company &quot;for the purpose of constructing and maintaining a bridge across the East River.&quot; Under the enabling act, the city of Brooklyn (which stood to benefit the most from the bridge) subscribed for $3 million of the capital stock, while the city of New York only subscribed for $1.5 million. The company was permitted to fix toll rates for pedestrians and all types of vehicles, receiving a profit of no more than 15 percent per year.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>MT</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/08/28/is_there_a_future_for_privatizing_t.php#comment-1449091</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/08/28/is_there_a_future_for_privatizing_t.php#comment-1449091</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:24:29 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;How exactly do private entities profit from owning infrastructure? For example, if someone bought the Brooklyn Bridge what would be the gain? Are we just going to end up paying tolls for the use of everything eventually?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>blablanyc</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/08/28/is_there_a_future_for_privatizing_t.php#comment-1448941</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/08/28/is_there_a_future_for_privatizing_t.php#comment-1448941</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:27:39 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;No. There isn&apos;t a future for privatization of infrastructure. Because private companies need to make a profit. If the operation isn&apos;t profitable they will want to get out. You would also want to to keep foreign companies from getting involved.

I can&apos;t even believe this is even being discussed. How much money has the US wasted on the war?

 &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>glob</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/08/28/is_there_a_future_for_privatizing_t.php#comment-1448924</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/08/28/is_there_a_future_for_privatizing_t.php#comment-1448924</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:06:28 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I have a bridge to sell you, it connects brooklyn to manhattan. All you have to do stand on one side and collect tolls from everyone that crosses.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Gothamist_Cynic</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/08/28/is_there_a_future_for_privatizing_t.php#comment-1448901</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/08/28/is_there_a_future_for_privatizing_t.php#comment-1448901</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:42:18 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Japan has been doing it for decades.  We&apos;re so fucking behind due to lazy fucks and corruption.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>TSOL</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/08/28/is_there_a_future_for_privatizing_t.php#comment-1448899</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/08/28/is_there_a_future_for_privatizing_t.php#comment-1448899</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:39:08 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The NY subway system was created by private companies. The Second Avenue subway line is a testament to the efficiency of the public sector!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>kenny000</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/08/28/is_there_a_future_for_privatizing_t.php#comment-1448845</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/08/28/is_there_a_future_for_privatizing_t.php#comment-1448845</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:39:35 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;There are places in THIS country where private entities finance public infrastructure. It&apos;s also more common in Europe if I&apos;m not mistaken.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>djwerdna</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/08/28/is_there_a_future_for_privatizing_t.php#comment-1448819</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/08/28/is_there_a_future_for_privatizing_t.php#comment-1448819</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:22:18 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Does any other country in the world rely on private funds to fund public infrastructure?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>