<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Landlords Sue to Overturn Tenant Protection Act</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/08/19/landlords_sue_to_overturn_tenant_pr.php</link>
<description>All comments for Landlords Sue to Overturn Tenant Protection Act</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:00:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jen@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jen@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Kojak</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/08/19/landlords_sue_to_overturn_tenant_pr.php#comment-1440904</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/08/19/landlords_sue_to_overturn_tenant_pr.php#comment-1440904</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:36:03 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Even though a well paid public offical owning a rent stabilized apartment is abhorrent as well as it is ridiculous, I&apos;d do exact same thing, even with the same salary.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jpeditor</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/08/19/landlords_sue_to_overturn_tenant_pr.php#comment-1440868</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/08/19/landlords_sue_to_overturn_tenant_pr.php#comment-1440868</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 02:26:53 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Christine Quim  has a house in NJ, fully carpeted, I imagine..

&quot;NY Sun had an editorial questioning why City Council Speaker Christine Quinn remains in a $1,600/month rent-stabilized apartment, when she makes $141,000/year from the City Council, owns half a $500,000 house in NJ, and her partner is a corporate lawyer enough for their combined income to probably be at least $300,000&quot;

http://gothamist.com/2008/08/11/wellpaid_elected_leaders_in_rentsta.php

Also, &quot;the City Council Speaker once stood with the angry masses against the West Side stadium and the Stuy Town sale. Now, she cuts back-room deals and collects hefty campaign checks from developers&quot; 

http://www.observer.com/2007/christine-quinn-real-estate-insider/

And lets not forget &quot;Quinn Scrambles To Explain Slush Funds In Budget&quot;

http://wcbstv.com/local/christine.quinn.budget.2.692056.html
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>grandzu</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/08/19/landlords_sue_to_overturn_tenant_pr.php#comment-1440827</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/08/19/landlords_sue_to_overturn_tenant_pr.php#comment-1440827</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:35:49 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;get we get rid of this annoying, sleazy, corrupt hoha already?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jenspellnogood</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/08/19/landlords_sue_to_overturn_tenant_pr.php#comment-1440502</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/08/19/landlords_sue_to_overturn_tenant_pr.php#comment-1440502</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:41:35 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;don&apos;t trust her, i warned you....&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jaycjay</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/08/19/landlords_sue_to_overturn_tenant_pr.php#comment-1440471</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/08/19/landlords_sue_to_overturn_tenant_pr.php#comment-1440471</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:25:03 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;So basically they want to give themselves more power to raise rents.

Uh... no. 

Anyway, the statement from the RSA spokesman would leave me, if I were a landlord, hoping that the suit itself does a better job of making an argument than he does when speaking to the press: &quot;For the first time, they are making a violation something that is not objective but something that is subjective.&quot;

The problem with that is that a clear definition of harassment is well-established both in penal codes and case law in the US. The argument that it&apos;s &quot;subjective&quot; is baseless.


&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Gothamist_Cynic</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/08/19/landlords_sue_to_overturn_tenant_pr.php#comment-1440442</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/08/19/landlords_sue_to_overturn_tenant_pr.php#comment-1440442</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:07:01 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;So basically they want to give themselves more power to raise rents.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>