Gothamist: Ed Asner Wants Ballot Referendum for New 9/11 Probe

Kingpin

Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:34:33 -0500

Thank you. :)

S.D.

Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:22:10 -0500

Best definition of a skeptic I've heard yet.

Kingpin

Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:52:01 -0500

You also have to love that as soon as you say you're a skeptic you're immediately branded a 'pawn of the puppet masters', if that isn't paranoid conspiracy I don't know what is. Skeptics weren't put on the planet to safeguard conspiracy perpetrators, skeptics were put on the planet to reign in common sense and to combat wild and unproven claims.

S.D.

Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:16:19 -0500

(sigh) "ckemp6205", 4 words you should keep in mind "Formatting" and "Run On sentences". Think about it. "rocket science"... Love it!! Alan Miller, soooooo "Patriots Question 9/11"? If someone disagrees with you, they're NOT a patriot?? Gee, How very GOP of you. Let's see, from that site: 130+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials 510+ Engineers and Architects 120+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals 270+ Professors Question 9/11 210+ 9/11 Survivors and Family Members 160+ Artists, Entertainers, and Media Professionals (AWESOME! "experts"..) No Kidding, 1,400 people? Wow... I'm going to go out on a limb here: You guys NEVER looked at the Debunking of the "Theories", did you? I mean why let convenient things like Facts get in the way, right?

ckemp6205

Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:26:57 -0500

one other thing the truth always wins in the end the Lie always will be exposed.

ckemp6205

Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:17:11 -0500

Ok for all those that doubt here is the issue the Family members who lost loved ones want the truth, that's all and there is nothing wrong with wanting the facts, here is a question for those who belive the official story, answer this question why did George Bush and Dick Cheney for months not want an investigation into 911, had it not been for the pressure of the family members there would have not been one, then why did bush and cheney not go under oath to testify regarding the events of 911, 3. why do you who believe the official story, dismiss those family members who lost loved ones on 911 as kooks, when all they want are the facts, 4 in a free an open society all people should be free to express their views on alternative ideas with out being belittled, 5 and yes there are rouge element in our government who will do any thing to make a buck. this has been done for years if you study history most would know this. false flags are a fact not a theory, what is lacking by those who buy the official story is to be able to critically think, and look for the truth, and there is nothing, and I mean nothing wrong with looking for the real facts about what happened on 911. it is better to keep an open mind than to resort to childish name calling because people who question the events that lead to 911 are looking for answers, it is their right and our duty as just decent human being to help get the REAL story of what happened on 911. love brings us together, hate and name calling divides us. I do not by the official story, and I do not think every-one in or government is bad, how-ever there are those in our government who mean us no good, now bush is an Idiot we all know that, But cheney and rumsfield,William krystal and a few other are as shady as they come, then there are out side factions of other government involved as well, then you have to wonder why cheney, and bush just gave the Saudis immunity in the law suit regarding 911 it doesn't take rocket science to figure out something stinks.

AlanMiller

Fri, 15 Aug 2008 03:07:49 -0500

Defenders of the official account of 9/11 would like to pretend there are no credible critics of it. Consider the following: - Raymond McGovern, PhD, former Chairman of National Intelligence Estimates (NIE) and 27-year CIA veteran. "I think at simplest terms, there's a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a joke." (According to the CIA, NIE's are "the most authoritative written judgments concerning national security issues") - William Christison, former Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis, overseeing 250 CIA analysts. 29-year CIA veteran. "I now think there is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us believe. … An airliner almost certainly did not hit The Pentagon. … The North and South Towers of the World Trade Center almost certainly did not collapse and fall to earth because hijacked aircraft hit them." - Melvin Goodman, PhD, former Division Chief of the CIA's Office of Soviet Affairs and Senior Analyst from 1966 - 1990. "The final [9/11 Commission] report is ultimately a coverup. I don't know how else to describe it." - General Albert Stubblebine, former commanding general of U.S. Army Intelligence. "I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, ‘The plane does not fit in that hole’. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What's going on?" These individuals played significant roles in the U.S. national security apparatus from the 1960's through the 1990's. They were relied on to collect essential information and provide critical analysis for decades, during which time the U.S. faced much more real and much more serious threats than anything today. We cannot now ignore their stunning condemnation of the official account of 9/11. Information about 1,000 other credible critics of the official account of 9/11 is available at http://PatriotsQuestion911.com/

S.D.

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:04:20 -0500

... ... Nice to know the "Truth" seekers are keeping up with the latest Buzz words. "false flag operation"... "Your slave masters would approve"? "BeTrueSeekTruth", Are you f__king kidding? Nice. The anniversary of that horrible day is approaching once again, and they just come out and spout their often debunked conspiracy theories. Honestly, You 9/11 conspiracy theorists ARE seriously losing it.

Sinchy

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:23:29 -0500

We cannot discount that 911 was a false flag operation as the US has been involved in other such pretext for war operations in the past. Gulf of Tonkin anyone. Or how about Seymor Hersh's recent revelation that Dick Cheney considered dressing up US navy boats as Iranian ships to attck our own boys to set off a war with Iran. http://www.truthout.org/article/hersh-cheney-plan-creating-false-flag-attack If they didn't knock down the towers they certainly let it happen and if not they failed miserably in stopping the attack even though there was a huge amount of evidence that they knew an attack was in the offing (remember the PDB anyone, "Bin Laden determined to attack"). So the three options are 1. Bush admin did it (Bush didn't have to know anything operational, and Cheney is far too crafty to have anything lead to him) and are war criminals and traitors of the highest order. 2. The admin knew something big was going to go down and they let it happen (the lack of air defense response is interesting, no?) and again they are huge traitors. 3. They knew something was up but Condi (Nat sec advisor), Tenet, the FBI, and the military were so incompetent and Bush and Cheney were too stupid to get the proper authorities motivated and coordinated to stop an attack, in which case we rallied around a bunch of idiot key-stone cops after the attack instead of drumming these incompetent crooks out of office. Anyone of these scenarios is appalling and whether or no you think they made it happen, let it happen, or were too stupid to stop it, the 911 commission held no one accountable for anything, and in fact some of these idiots got promotions. Wise up people, there is justification for a new investigation no matter how you look at it. Oh and how about a full independent investigation of the now CASE CLOSED Anthrax attacks. Oh nothing to see here. move along...

Kingpin

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:20:11 -0500

Figures, as soon as the speculation comes along one of the Truthers pops up and insults everyone who doubts the Truthers' claims. I'm perfectly content to remain in the belief that September 11th was not a huge conspiracy committed by the United States govenment. I don't doubt there is corruption on the government, but you're not going to convince me it was an inside job. I just hope that in ten years time, this conspiracy theory has fallen by the wayside. There is more to life then the 9/11 conspiracy, you know.

The Man Bat

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:55:36 -0500

It was a Fals Flag event. America, you have been duped. Big time.

The Man Bat

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:52:55 -0500

Google "Sivan Kurzberg" Like the man said ..." half that story ain't never been told"

ides_of_march

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:24:12 -0500

If that cranky, broken down, old commie Ed Asner is involved, it has to be something stupid.

BeTrueSeekTruth

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 07:54:49 -0500

I really like term "unhinged conspiracy theorists". Your slave masters would approve. This is a pejorative remark that's designed to short circuit rational thought and flip the reader into knee jerk reaction mode. The truth is that the events on 9/11 WERE the result of a conspiracy. There are a lot of groups in this world who conspire to all sorts of illegal activites. All those who deride these brave souls are not doing so from a surfeit of knowledge on the topic. Do you philistines realize that the government has shown all the signs of a suspect with something to hide on this topic? The fact that they appointed Kissinger to head the commission should be glaring enough. Kind of like appointing Vito Corleone to investigate mafia activity. Even the corporate controlled mainstream propganda machine had to admit this: [Kissinger's appointment was criticized by some who said he was too close to powerful national and international figures to be independent. In an editorial published November 29, The New York Times suggested the White House chose him "to contain an investigation it has long opposed." ] http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/12/13/kissinger.resigns/ Why would the government oppose investigating probably the most heinous crime that's ever occurred on American soil? Take your fascist sunglasses off and realize that there is some serious corruption going on in the halls of decision of this once great country. Also research the Reichstag fire of 1933 and how Hitler used this event to gain a foothold for his Nazi party. He even passed his own version of the (Un)Patriot(ic) act: The Enabling act. The words of Santyana are coming true before our very eyes: "Those who ignore history are destined to repeat it".

representativepress

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:21:46 -0500

this is the real 9/11 truth: SCANDAL: 9/11 Commissioners Bowed to Pressure to Suppress Main Motive for the 9/11 Attacks. why call for a new investigation when we know what testimonies were kept out of the report?

representativepress

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:11:40 -0500

On 9/11, WTC2 Hit WTC7, Seriously Damaging the South Side

UnrepentantFenian

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:46:46 -0500

Having been inside 7 about 20 minutes before collapse - I can assure you it was fully involved.

Fritzdecat

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:53:59 -0500

Good Point Office Ninja you said it all

Kingpin

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:12:30 -0500

Um, MrEthiopian, 7WTC sustained significant fire damage prior to collapse, not to mention there is photographic proof of the debris cloud catching the face of the building facing the WTC site and as such, is incredibly likely to have sustained damage from debris... If you want to know more, visit: http://www.debunking911.com/ And you can see clear photos on the following page of 7WTC damaged from debris: http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm I suggest you get your head out of the sand and start doing some research from debunking911.

MrEthiopian

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 20:06:38 -0500

With all the evidence that is out there and just having a bit of common sense one can only come to the conclusion that 9/11 wan another false flag event. Please do a bit of research on WTC 7, the building was not hit with an airplane nor was it struck with much debris from 1 or 2 yet is mysteriously fell like it was imploded. Even the governments own 9/11 report cannot explain why this building fell. Common sense people get your head out of the sand and do some research.

S.D.

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:09:51 -0500

(sigh) Chris lee, most of their crap was debunked years ago... Geez. Crap like that will just get worse when September rolls in.

UnrepentantFenian

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:53:02 -0500

I have already dispatched the black helicopters to Chris Lee's house. We must silence these truthers once and for all. I certainly hope his apartment isn;t lined with aluminum foil as that will certainly disable our probes.

eyekantspel

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:28:21 -0500

Wait... Ed Asner is alive?? What else has this administration been hiding?

jenspellnogood

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:22:44 -0500

short of insuring that these douchebags enjoy their 1st amendment rights, anyone acknowledging them should seriously consider treatment. way to go gothamist, more cutting edge reporting...

chris lee

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:16:12 -0500

Yeah, imagine that. Responsible citizens demanding a second opinion from THIS administration, whose probity is demonstrably unimpeachable. Why, oh WHY, would the Bush administration and Halliburton, and Dubai International and the oil profiteers lie to us....hmmmmm..?

officeninja

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:13:49 -0500

I just have a hard time believing that the same government that has masterminded the clusterfuck that is Iraq and Afghanistan could manage to pull off such a spectacular "conspiracy" on American soil...and keep it quiet for 7 years.

nerdkiller

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:12:36 -0500

I find this whole thing incredibly offensive. They should go back in time and be in the WTC on 9/11 so they can find out exactly what happened and then obsess over it when they're dead. That and Jews did it.

petercow99

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:08:41 -0500

Some day, someone will write their doctoral thesis on the 9/11 'troofers'. Likewise, it's a shame that (as the 9/11 Commission itself admitted), they gave Giuliani a pass on NYPD/FDNY dysfunction, bad radios, the decision to site the 'bunker' at WTC 7, etc. Unfortunately though, this is a circus in the making.

buzardb8

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:07:33 -0500

Shouldn't this story be on The Onion?

chris lee

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:07:22 -0500

Are the people discounting this group SERIOUS? Why do you believe the official story SO firmly? Isn't it strange that EVERY major news outlet had Bin Laden's face front page, when to THIS day we have no PROOF he masterminded it. Just alot of phony videotapes. Where is the Bin Laden family? Odd that they are so CONSPICUOUSLY absent from the news. There ARE unanswered questions and inconsistencies. Stop pretending there aren't.

UnrepentantFenian

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:04:31 -0500

Ya know who else is a 9/11 truth freak? Jesse "the body" Ventura. The same guy who was too much of a crazy survivalist for Montana.

jazlow

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:01:36 -0500

I believe whatever George Bush tells me. He's friends with Jesus.

Alex

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:58:45 -0500

9/11 truthers are hilariously pathetic

nicemarmot

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:57:51 -0500

OMG, you mean breathing in asbestos and other assorted toxic chemicals is bad for you??? Crap. I'm gonna have to stop those daily sojourns to get high off the fumes on the BQE.

nomnomnom

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:57:05 -0500

That's a random bunch of people.

TimSPC

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:56:56 -0500

Mr. Wendell should give his money back.

aa77

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:51:37 -0500

^ ^ ignore these issues....and they are bound to repeat themselves.

UnrepentantFenian

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:47:54 -0500

I love when Gothamist trolls itself. Really? Arrested Development? Since when are they relevant. When was the last time someone asked Speech what he thought about things. Ignore these kooks and they'll go away.