Update: Oreo, Dog Thrown Off Building, Was Euthanized
People Wait For Tomorrow's UWS Apple Store Opening
Emily and Sarah Kunstler, Filmmakers
Cheap Chicken Wing Deal Ruined by Gunslinging Teens
FIT Students Busted For Drug Dealing Get Probation
A DOT plan [pdf] to install a protected bike path on Eighth Avenue – similar to the one that’s already been implemented on Ninth Avenue from 14th to 23rd Street – has been rejected by Manhattan Community Board 4, which includes Chelsea. The proposal, which would not require the elimination of any traffic lanes while buffering cyclists from motorists, was previously approved by the board’s Transportation Planning Committee, as well as Community Board 2.
Chelsea Now reports that the committee “enthusiastically” presented the DOT proposal at Wednesday night’s meeting and recommended it for approval, but seemed unprepared “for the onslaught of opposition from the rest of the board.” Board member and long-time gay rights activist Allen Roskoff led the dissent:
I refer to Eighth Ave. between 14th and 23rd Streets as ‘Gay Boulevard.’ Large numbers of gay people go there… It’s where we feel at home… The atmosphere there—the restaurants, the activity, the people walking— it’s a home to many of us that no other avenue is. I don’t think these changes are for the positive in any way, shape or form.The board voted against the change, but the DOT could still push the project through against the their wishes. Beyond painting the bike lane pink, it's unclear how the city would win over dissenters like Roskoff. [Via Streetsblog]
add to stumble upon
add to reddit
tweet this
post to facebook
That's pretty damn silly.
How on earth does adding this bike path change anything about the feel of the street? This is ridiculous.
Unbelievable...how does a safe bike lane have ANYthing to do with the neighborhood's gay-ness or non-gayness or whatever?
... waiting to see if Deca's head will explode ...
If the bike path is gay or not...can't everyone just love & accept it for the bike path that it is?
Yeah, Roskoff is an idiot.
Roskoff is just letting everyone know that someone forgot to pay off the gay mafia on this one.
now i've heard it all. next thing you know i'll see an elephant fly.
Roskoff is an insult to gay people.
As a gay man: WTF!?!? If anything a bike lane with a freaking flower-planted median would ADD ambiance, not take away from it. Jebus H. Creist Community Boards are full of wankers.
just scanned the whole pdf- this is a very good looking project. Ubelievable that anybody would object.
Buy a clue jenspellnogood, it was the homos in NYC that STARTED the modern gay rights movement when they beat the shiat out of the NYPD officers that wouldn't stop harassing them. In Germany they even call Gay Pride "Christopher Street Day."
Roskoff wants Go Go Boys and Pole Dancers dancing on every 3rd planter!
Fu*ck Roskoff, build it anyway!!!
I can haz Napoleon Complex?
Oh, wait...
A bike path won't stop anyone from acting overly flamboyant or showing off the fact that they have nothing better to do than work out all day.
I believe the biker in the illustration is wearing purple. By the caftan of Harvey Fierstein, what more does Roskoff want?
proof that idiots and assholes come in all shapes, sizes, denominations, and sexual orientations.
hey 2102 that's something to be really proud of. by the way, i was referring to the fact that mass is now recognizing out of state fag marriages, not the inception of the promiscuity plague.
#22 is spot on, present company included, ;)
political correctness has run amok in this fucking society, and humor was the first victim. god bless, oops, george carlin.
George Carlin was an outspoken supporter of gay rights. Guess you'll need a new idol.
So Christopher Street is no longer gay blvd?
I think Gothamist is being shamelessly lazy and one-sided in this report. If there was an "onslaught" of opposition, why aren't we told what is was other than the stupid gay bashing?
This plan obviously has merit and Gothamist obviously supports it. But you won't garner support by treating your readers like Fox News monkeys.
One problem that I can see with the current plan: pedestrians will wonder onto the bike path without looking causing injury to themselves & others (like they do on the west side bike path). It needs some kind of barrier. I recommend little metal posts far apart enough to accommodate strollers & delivery carts.
Wow, what a crappy and misleading Gothamist post.
Allen Roskoff did not LEAD the dissent. He did have the most obtuse dissent, which is agreeably quite ludicrous and amusing.
Most of the dissent, however, focused on noise, traffic and the affects on local businesses.
2102, please please please tell me you're gay, and will NOT be reproducing. you certainly are the stupidest poster i've had the displeasure of reading in some time.
No, it's true. Roskoff led the Community Board in a rousing rendition of "Keep It Gay" from the Producers.
It isn't needed... There is a bike path just one block over!
Fear of change? That the introduction of an attractive and safer corridor for cyclists might introduce a "new element" into the neighborhood that might not appreciate all that fabulous gayness?(!)
gay people don't bike. they rollerblade. Remember back in the day when Rollerblading was cool in the mid 90's? the gays took it over and then all the heteros stopped doing it.
You want equal rights? Get treated like every other New Yorker. And just deal with it.
this! is! so! gay!
these "protected bike lanes" suck, pedestrians just walk in it, so it's almost as dangerous.
I believe the real objection to the bike lane has nothing to do with being Gay or with introducing outside agitators. Here's what it has to do with, from the article in gaycitynews.com: "McCall said negative impacts have already been felt on Ninth Avenue for vehicles making deliveries and patrons using cars to access the stores."
In other words, the real concern is money -- the money of the proprietors of the stores along the avenue -- and the business about the Gay community is just an angle.
Seems like a sound plan, didn't strike me as anti-gay.
Does this meen the NYCDOT has to paint the bike-lane surface in purple or rainbow colored?
Um. I like the illustration.
That is all.
what if they made a provision that all cyclist had to remove their seats and sit directly on their seat post before riding down gay boulevard?
would that be gay enough?
But bike paths are totally gay.