<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Central Park&apos;s Lake Renewal</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/07/19/central_parks_lake_renewal.php</link>
<description>All comments for Central Park&apos;s Lake Renewal</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 16:27:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jen@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jen@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Jen Chung</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/07/19/central_parks_lake_renewal.php#comment-1412492</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/07/19/central_parks_lake_renewal.php#comment-1412492</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 16:38:38 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;dadoc, thanks for that explanation--that&apos;s very interesting.  I also like the idea of a &quot;surface skimmer,&quot; and I think they need on in Prospect Park.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Pull My Finger</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/07/19/central_parks_lake_renewal.php#comment-1412452</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/07/19/central_parks_lake_renewal.php#comment-1412452</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:23:45 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe they should put one of those water fountains in the middle of it. Being that it is art and all.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>dadoc</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/07/19/central_parks_lake_renewal.php#comment-1412434</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/07/19/central_parks_lake_renewal.php#comment-1412434</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 12:58:34 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s about time. The lake has been so degraded over the years. Loads of sediment from shore erosion. Loads of sediment from fallen leaves. Loads of organics from geese/Dogs, etc. Virtually no inflow/outlfow. The bottom is a low-oxygen muck of organic sediment with no plants, no contour. The Algal blooms are horrible. Sure, Bullheads, turtles, bluegills,
&amp; Carp, but Bass &amp; Perch are way down. Yes, It&apos;s the natural course of eutrofaction of Northeast ponds/lakes, but this is a 100+ year old artificial pond in a city park. Some heavy dredging, change in inflow/outflow, aeration (like in the Meer), bottom contour &amp; erosion protection would go a long way. and a surface skimmer (saw one in Baltimore harbor years ago, small boat with a rolling belt) could reduce the surface leaves/scum. Just don&apos;t do what they did with the 59th Street pond &amp; eliminate almost all shoreline access. Reduce Carp &amp; stunted Bluegill
population, reintroduce more Largemouths, Perch &amp; Pickerel. Some Tiger Muskies would be great! &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>