Gothamist: "After Nature" Brings Headless Horse to the New Museum

driftwood

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:38:14 -0500

It isn't cruel. It's just a taxidermy horse skin. It's no more cruel or weird than the Bodies Exhibit. Probably less so actually. In my opinion, art is supposed to be able to express itself in an almost limitless field. So yes be careful with treatments of animals, but allow art to be an expression.

Pull My Finger

Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:26:15 -0500

Now that's what I call art. PAlease!

DeeDee7

Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:48:21 -0500

This is wrong, unjustifiable and cruel to animals. A horse's life is precious. Why belittle it with this unnecessary and inhumane display?

GlennQuagmire

Sat, 19 Jul 2008 09:37:30 -0500

A horse is a horse of course of course...

suepart

Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:32:10 -0500

artsy fartsy asses going to look at a horse's ass

Gregoire

Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:40:43 -0500

Can't look that gift horse in the mouth.

Rfive

Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:44:57 -0500

Yes! More frest MFAs!!