July 15, 2008
Rangel Will Give Up One Rent-Stabilized Apartment
After the revelation that he rents at least three rent-stabilized apartments (one unit is made up of two previously combined units) and ensuing uproar, Representative Charles Rangel will give up a 10th floor one-bedroom unit at Harlem's Lenox Terrace that he used as an office.
The NY Times first reported Rangel's real estate riches last Thurday, and Rangel defended his actions as being legal. However, rent regulations require that, per the Times, "rent-stabilized apartments to be used solely as a primary residence." What's more, the owner of Rangel's building, the Olnick organization, typically ousts rent-stabilized tenants in favor of market-rate ones, making Rangel's ability to keep a number of rent-stabilized units all the more incredible.
The apartment Rangel is giving up is a one-bedroom that would usually rent for at least $1,700, and Rangel was splitting the rent-stabilized $630 cost between himself and his re-election campaign. His spokesman only said, "Mr. Rangel has indicated that he is not willing to say any more."
There are calls for inquiries into Rangel's rental situation, after different groups have questioned whether the difference between rent-stabilized and market-rate rents would constitute a gift.
| 
add to stumble upon
add to reddit
email this
add to facebook
add to del.icio.us
[ report this ]
Charlie, that's a start. By all means keep your other three apartments, but it's time to Luxury Decontrol your ass!
[ report this ]
Well he HAS to give up the one with his office in it. That one is actually ILLEGAL. So this really isn't much of a concession.
[ report this ]
this is such BS, like he didn't know that he was in violation of the guidelines regulating tenancy. Never liked him anyway, what a blowhard.
[ report this ]
I hope he can tough it out.
[ report this ]
Between this and Rangel's center, I really don't know what's gotten into him.
[ report this ]
He was doing splitsies with his re-election campaign? Really? On a rent stabilized residential apartment? And he didn't know that it was improper and possibly illegal to do so? Really? Really Really???
Is he REALLY that dumb or just slimy and unethical?
Survey says all of the above.
[ report this ]
Luxury decontrol doesn't apply to Congressman Rangel. He's over 65 years old (by 13 years!), and is therefore grandfathered into the system. Apart from the campaign office, the other apts appear to be above board. Certainly, an envious deal, but not an illegal one.
In terms of compliance with Federal gift laws, that's a separate issue. However, I could see how he would not know that he had a deal. Many people of his generation have such sweetheart deals. It's the 35 & under crowd that does not.
[ report this ]
More corrupt politicians. Never fails.
[ report this ]
#7, something is obviously wrong even with the other 3 units. First, the two combined units we're kept as separate leases, why? to keep them below the 2k cutoff - this is definitely intentional, one would have to be naive to think otherwise. Second, the 3rd unit was not part of the original two he moved into the 80s - so again, it is in violation of the letter and spirit of the law. One has to wonder why one of the largest and most litigious real estate groups is providing Rangel with such a large 'gift' by looking the other way -- again illegal.
[ report this ]
"primary residence" constitutes ONE apartment per eligible tenant, no matter how you parse it
[ report this ]
# 7's statement "Luxury decontrol doesn't apply to Congressman Rangel. He's over 65 years old (by 13 years!), and is therefore grandfathered into the system." is complete nonsense. It has absolutely no basis on the law. There is no such thing as anyone being exempt from luxury decontrol. Period.
# 9 hit the nail on the head. I agree completely.
[ report this ]
Holding more than ONE rent stabilized lease is illegal.Also it not being a primary residence is illegal.
Many ,many tenants have been evicted because they lived in suburbs and kept their rent stabilized leases either subletting illegally to make money or keeping them hoping to get a inside price on a coop/condo conversion.
He really should be prosecuted for this.
[ report this ]
Chuck is a scumbag cut from the same cloth as those other 2 Harlem fraudsters - Jackson & Sharpton. The three of them should die in a fire. These characters do more to hurt race relations than anyone in history ever has. Sharpton & Jackson more so of course, but Rangel actually has a real title and so he has more to answer for.
[ report this ]
Yeah I'm sure ignorant people like yourself aren't at all part of the problem, UnrepentantFenian. Jesse Jackson is from South Carolina, and is most closely associated with Chicago. He also was Shadow Senator for Washington, D.C. during the 90s.