A three-year-old boy was seriously injured when a pit bull, unleashed by his mother's boyfriend, attacked him. Kamar Reynolds underwent surgery to reattach his ear and remains in serious condition; his aunt said, "His ear was torn off. His face was swollen. Half of his face was open. His mouth was bleeding blood. We put a sheet over his mouth so it could hold in the ear and the blood."
Authorities say Reynolds' mother was the real target of the attack. Apparently Frantz Cesar was upset at Reynolds' mother Keesha and, per the Daily News, "kicked in an air conditioner at her East New York home and threw his pit bull Rocky through the open window." Keesha Reynolds tried to pry the dog away, but the dog was fierce.
The dog was euthanized and Cesar was charged with assault, criminal possession and acting in a manner to injured a child. Kamar's aunt claimed though Cesar "apologized... he was laughing and smiling," after taking the dog away.
In the wake of this incident and the mauling of a Staten Island man, many animal advocates have pointed the three main reasons for dog attacks are 1) The dog is not spayed or neutered; 2) The dog is chained or tethered in a yard; and 3) The dog is not socialized and treated as a member of the family. Additionally, training the dog to act aggressively contributes to violent behavior. Human Society issues specialist Adam Goldfarb has a Q&A at CityRoom covering dog violence.





These people are abusing dogs, they need to be mauled.
Lots of bad news about Pit Bull dogs lately. Here's something to even the score:
http://mfrost.typepad.com/cute_overload/2008/06/one-puppehs-onl.html
I'm sure Franz Cesar (what kind of a name is that?) will beat the charges. In fact, I'll bet his Mommy and Daddy have paid his bail and are hiring him the best criminal defense attorney in the city.
The animal advocates need to point out that this breed is overly aggressive by nature and should not be allowed in the city period.
#4, overly aggressive like Dobermans, German Shepherds, Rottweilers, Ridgebacks, Akitas, and Bull Mastiffs?
Jeez, attempted murder, maybe?
if any animal should be eradicated from the animal kingdom it's the pit bull.
there have been far less great white shark attacks in the last 150 years than pit bulls. in fact, on average since 1846 there have been 2 great white shark attacks a year.
Here's a neutral study tracking dog attacks and deaths by breed betweem 1982 and 2006.
http://www.dogbitelaw.com/Dog%20Attacks%201982%20to%202006%20Clifton.pdf
Pit bull attacks in the study numbered 1100; German Shepherds, by contrast, had 63, Dobermans had 11, Akitas had 48 and Chows had 49. The breed is dangerous. Whether that is because the dogs are raised incorrectly, they have more aggressive temperaments or they are physically constructed to do more damage than other dogs, it doesn't matter; they're dangerous.
Perhaps there should be special licensing for pit bulls, the way there is for other potentially deadly weapons, such as cars and firearms.
So who is calling for the eradication of the great white? No creature should be eradicated.
You know who else wanted to eradicate a particular breed?
Great whites don't walk down the street and aren't kept as pets.
If they don't want to ban the breed, they need to ensure that it is not going to cause a danger to others. You can't treat a pit bull like a Lhasa Apso. The potential for harm is different. I'm all for special licensing that would ensure that the dogs were being kept responsibly.
Pit bulls in the hands of dangerous owners kill once in a blue moon. Cars in the hands of dangerous owners kill every single day, but no one's advocated banning those.
I thought that this New Yorker piece by Malcolm Gladwell regarding pit bulls was interesting:
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/02/06/060206fa_fact?currentPage=all
I've always believed that a bad dog is the result of a bad owner, and that pit bulls are disproportionately responsible for attacks on humans because they are trained for dogfights more commonly than any other breed. And dogfighting happens to be a huge problem in New York City.
Because of this, I've never believed that pit bulls should be banned outright. When socialized properly, they can be among the sweetest, friendliest dogs. I've never heard anyone bring up the idea of special licensing for pit bulls, but now that it's been mentioned in these comments, I like the idea. Regulating these animals would do a service both to public safety -- and to the dogs themselves. We tend to think of pit bulls as being vicious, but we often don't think of them as being regularly abused, when in fact many pit bulls are vicious because they have been abused. I'm willing to bet that there are more pit bulls euthanized in the city every year because they've been horribly mauled by other dogs in fighting rings than because they've attacked people. And of course, when fighting dogs and people meet, the results can be deadly. Licensing of other types of animals, especially exotic pets, occurs elsewhere in the United States; why not try licensing pit bulls? Only allow them to be purchased or adopted as puppies, require that they receive proper socialization and regular vet visits, etc.
On a final note, as a ferret lover, I'd just like to add that New York City still considers ferrets to be dangerous, when in fact ferrets attack humans far less often than both dogs and cats, and usually spend their waking hours being cute and walking into walls, because they're not the sharpest tools in the shed. If we've banned harmless, brainless ferrets, then we can certainly try regulating dogs that are used too often for fighting.
There's a parallel here to the story of the 260 pound basketball player who threw a beating to a guy literally half his size...
Do we call for limits or licensing on anyone who crosses a certain threshold of size or physical strength? Of course not: that's an absurd question.
When bad owners get their hands on a small dog, the animal itself probably suffers the most--as well as the neighbors who listen to it carry on all day. However, a powerful dog in the same circumstances is very potentially a disaster waiting to happen.
So the kid will probably go to jail and this dog got euthanized, but the parents and owners are the ones to blame for setting them up for the fall.
You guys are racially profiling dogs now? I heard those pitbulls also cheat on their wives and don't pay child support. They also sell lots of drugs and are on the wrong side of the criminal justice system.
Instead of banning pitbulls, we should ban stupid people that don't know how to raise a pet, be it a schnauzer that keeps barking the whole day or a killer pitbull...
There's a reason why these "bad owners" gravitate to pit bulls. You don't see many of these life-failures walking their dobermans on heavy chains -- that's because dobermans are rarely aggresive, and when they are they aren't as dangerous as pit bulls. Just because a dog could be sweet if raised properly doesn't mean that it isn't proper to ban them for the greater good. And yeah, then the life-failures will move on to rottweilers or whatever, but that will still be safer than pit bulls. And if you happen to own a good one, well...tough shit.
It bothers me when people try to apply standards of human profiling and discrimination to animals.
As a society, we generally don't allow people to keep tigers, polar bears or eagles as pets. We require people who do have these animals to have special facilities with certain standards of security, and special training to handle them. That's neither discriminating nor generalizing; it is acknowledging that the animals are wild, are perhaps, overall, ill-suited as house pets, and require more scrutiny and regulation than other breeds.
let asian's like rocknrope eat them.
the rove dog.
now who says these pitbulls are good with children?
We should apply standards of human profiling and discrimination to animals. Some animals are more dangerous than others. As a society that prides itself on its love for dogs we can't be blind their capabilities and their willingness to attack us. Just the price we pay for the domestication of these creatures.
http://satiricalmilk.blogspot.com/
With all these cases it isn't the dog's fault. It is the fault of the idiot subhumans who abuse these dogs to the point they are weapons.
Any dog can be turned into a vicious one - from a Chihuahua to a Great Dane. It all depends on how they are treated, trained and socialized.
I have known Rottweilers who were just big sweethearts, loved other dogs, loved people, and wouldn't hurt anything except pigeons. The biggest problem with him was him finding and eating unattended sandwiches.
Blah, blah, blah. I've got a vicious chihuahua, but the chances of her ripping off a kid's ear or eating a 90 year old man alive is zero. My mom had a Rottweiler who was 120 lbs of slobbering puppy love, but he stayed safely behind a 6 foot fence in the suburbs. People who live in close quarters should not have dangerous animals with the potential to kill their neighbors. That's why that guy had his tiger taken away, remember?
But at least it wasn't a bicyclist.
Or was he?
pitbulls also defraud the social welfare system. They stay home and pee all day and don't take care of their kids!
Just what would be so terrible about banning pit bull ownership? Is there anything so inherently special and wonderful about them that you couldn't make do with a dog of another breed? One of the immutable facts of life is that you can't have everything you want. Get a golden lab or a collie.
Send the sick motherfuckers who own these dogs up the river.
Somebody wanted this dog breed because it makes them feel a certain way about themselves. And as a result of some stupid, posturing male vanity hangup, this poor child is horribly mauled and disfigured. How could anything be worth that?
Why can't they euthanize the guy?
the worst part is that this mom will probably forgive him... ya know for trying to kill her and nearly killing her baby. she'll say something like, "jail changed him. he loves me. really."
Was he black?
The pitbull I mean...
When will we wake up and exterminate pit bulls???
#12 - thanks so much for the link to the Malcolm Gladwell story.
I'm not crazy about pitbulls, but I tend to lean more towards licensing and registering them. As usual, it's the stupid humans who are behind stupidity. Banning the animals would only take care of *half* the problem. O_o
Just about anyone who hates pitbulls or thinks they should be banned has probably never met a well trained and socialized pitbull with a responsible owner. They're incredibly intelligent, friendly, playful and loyal dogs. What people don't realize about them is that historically, they've been bred for DOG aggression, and specifically bred AGAINST human aggression. Why? Because early breeders knew they didn't want strong dogs attacking them. Generally, a pitbull needs to be trained for human aggression, and if it demonstrates a natural tendency towards human aggression it should be put down or neutered and given to someone who understands how to deal with such an animal. Irresponsible breeding and ownership is what's led to the breed being demonized.
Licensing for breeders and mandatory education for potential owners would be a godsend for this misunderstood breed.
You still haven't answered the question. Why are they so special that another breed couldn't fill a dog owner's needs? Are they more intelligent, more friendly, more playful and/or more loyal than other dogs? If not, then there's no real loss if people aren't allowed to own them.
What made you so "special" that your parents wanted to keep you? Wouldn't another child have fulfilled their needs? Are you "more intelligent, more friendly, more playful..."? What an absurd question, right?
It's close-minded people like you who refuse to see any good in this breed. I have had my lab/pit mix since he was 9 weeks old (now a year and a half) and the most "brutal attack" that has ever occurred is on the football he plays with everyday. And then, he doesn't even growl or show his teeth.) In fact, I can take the football out of his mouth and he does nothing...never has. (Heck, I even brush his teeth!) I have raised my dog to obey, play with kittens, and provide immeasurable companionship. He is very much a part of my family.
BTW, I had a full-blooded cocker spaniel and it attacked my daughter out of the blue when she was a baby. I don't see that breed being "exterminated" any time soon, though.
Granted, every single animal (including humans) follows their natural instincts to protect themselves. But, animals can be trained to behave and curb those instincts if provided a loving and safe environment. If you raise a ANY DOG BREED to be vicious and aggressive...it will be.
What made you so "special" that your parents wanted to keep you? Wouldn't another child have fulfilled their needs? Are you "more intelligent, more friendly, more playful..."? What an absurd question, right?
One more time...DOGS ARE NOT PEOPLE. Trying to use this analogy to argue that pit bulls should not be licensed or banned is RIDICULOUS. You don't need a dog of a certain breed as a pet.
I'm sure there are pits out there who are warm and fuzzy and would never harm a fly. There are also vicious Yorkies out there who would take someone's face off if they could. The difference is that the pit bull has both the demonstrated ability and propensity to cause damage.
When pit bull owners and supporters try to brush off criticism and the need for licensing, they don't realize they're harming both themselves and the breed, as well as any other dogs who have to be on the street with these animals. The argument "well, the dogs are sweet if raised right..." doesn't hold water. The dogs aren't being raised right, and if the current laws stay on the books, that will continue to be the case.
If pit bull fans were truly concerned about their welfare--and not just their their own selfish need for gratification with the dog breed of their personal choice--they'd be at the forefront of trying to get these dogs licensed, regulated and only owned by responsible humans.
I used to stereotype pit bulls myself until I became a dog owner myself, they really get a bad rap.
They're sweet lovable dogs when raised in a normal environment where they're socialized with other dogs/people at a young age, instead of being hung from lightpoles, starved, beaten, weed smoke blown in their ears, burnt with newport butts, set on fire, and on a choke collar 24/7.
Ban Pits, and these dog-thugs would raise Rotties or Dobies or Chihuahuas to fight and attack people. The people belong in a cage.
It is not about the breed being exterminated at all. Domestic Dogs are bred by humans and we breed the breeds and make them up, so we can choose to breed a new breed if we want and to change the American Pit Bull. We can choose to stop breeding dogs that are good for fighting. We can breed pit bulls down and not breed them to have bigger jaws and tougher muscles. It is up to the dog breeders. I live in Brooklyn and there are plenty of people who purposely breed pit bulls themselves at their homes with the goal of trying to breed the toughest dog in town. And so it is a human construct to breed these dogs to be the meanest and toughest dogs around and then also train them that way.
So it goes both ways, why breed a dog to be good at fighting if dog fighting is not allowed?
It is not just the training but also the breeding. Sure a loving home with an owner that does not train the dog to mean and fight helps. But also not breeding dogs to have the most muscles and the biggest jaws also helps. It goes hand and hand. We are the breeders of domestic dogs and we can choose not to breed a dog that is built to lock jaw.
Humans breed dogs to do certain things. In general one should get a dog and live with a dog that is best for their environment and where the dog can do what it is bred for. That is the best case scenario.
If you live on a farm and need a dog for the job of: "Farmers and ranchers used their APBTs for protection, as catch dogs for semi-wild cattle and hogs, to hunt, to drive livestock, and as family companions."
Then that is one thing.
But there are people living in the city who are breeding them for fighting and then keep like one or two puppies and the other ones get given away or end up at the pound or taken by animal control, and this is what needs to be stopped at the source. Yes Pit Bulls can be sweet with a certain upbringing, but the source from where they are coming from many times where bred with bad intentions, with the intentions of breeding a dog to be the meanest baddest dog in the hood. This is what needs to be watched and stopped.
From Wikipedia:
American Pit Bull Terriers and the law
American Pit Bull Terriers have historically been and are still commonly used for dog fighting. Although dog fighting is illegal in the United States and many other countries, it is still practiced, and is usually accompanied by gambling. In the United States participating in dog fighting is a felony in 49 states, and United States federal law prohibits interstate transport of dogs for fighting purposes. [11]
Due to the nature of dog fighting and the image of the Pit Bull as a "tough" dog, American Pit Bull Terriers can be subjected to severe abuse and often end up in the custody of animal control services, where they are routinely euthanized.[12] A large percentage of dogs euthanized in New York City, Chicago, and Los Angeles are pit bull type breeds.
In the United Kingdom, the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 prohibits the sale or breeding of "any dog of the type known as pit bull terrier." Some jurisdictions in the Australian states of Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria and the United States have similar breed-specific legislation, varying from a total ban on ownership to muzzling in public. Similarly, in Ontario, Canada, the ownership of APBTs has been banned in the Dog Owners' Liability Act.
As of August 29, 2005, the "owning, breeding, transferring, importing or abandoning" of APBTs is illegal in Ontario, Canada, given that it was found that the APBT breed "poses a danger to the public". [13]
Since 1993, after a number of serious incidents, it is forbidden in The Netherlands to breed pit bulls or pit bull like dogs. Pitbulls and pitbull like dogs without a FCI pedigree can be and are being impounded by authorities and will be put to sleep. Basically, this will mean that the number of pitbulls and pitbull like dogs in The Netherlands will decline as years progress.
[edit]
So it is not about the dogs that are already alive it is about stopping the breeding of these dogs for these purposes of dog fighting, and the home breeding.