<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: No Retractable Roof for Proposed WTC Transit Hub</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php</link>
<description>All comments for No Retractable Roof for Proposed WTC Transit Hub</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:15:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jen@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jen@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>NannyState</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397717</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397717</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:18:23 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Calatrava sure looks great in sketch ups, but what&apos;s funny is how his public projects are always overbudget yet he does better when it&apos;s a private development. His ChicagoSpire is going up nicely and appears to be on target, yet so many public works such as his Ciudad de las Ciencias in Valencia just go on and on. All that Spanish government money must have put this guy in an opiate grip.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Spiritof76</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397666</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397666</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:50:42 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Look at the size of the thing. I knew from the get-go that there was no way it would ever get built. It&apos;s a mechanical nighmare and would have needed constant maintenance. Assuming it was ever constructed, and the movable aspect of it easily made it less structurally efficient and much more expensive. No engineer would have designed anything like that; only an &quot;artistic&quot; architect would.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Think twice</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397648</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397648</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:30:58 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;BTW don&apos;t those renderings remind you of Krypton before it blew up.

&quot;I tell you Jor-El, Krypton is merely shifting in orbit, nothing to fret over&quot; said newly appointed Executive Director Christopher Ward.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Think twice</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397640</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397640</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:25:22 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The &quot;temporary&quot; PATH station is real enough. Let&apos;s have no more ego-tripping politicians collaborating with star-chitects and their Absurdist designs.

Use those billions to extend the PATH to Newark Airport or even replace the AirTrain monorail with it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>fugothamist</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397533</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397533</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:37:20 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;ground zero is a microcosm for everything wrong with america after 9/11&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jjb009</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397505</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397505</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:21:29 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;All of Calatrava&apos;s $hit looks the same...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>spiritross</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397491</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397491</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:12:38 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;What about the monkey butlers?

and the famous escalator to nowhere?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>tnturner</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397487</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397487</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:11:00 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;big deal. Looks like it opens about 20ft. Calatrava designed an addition to the Milwaukee Art Museum 10 years ago that doesn&apos;t work anyway. Save the loot.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>thenamesdave</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397484</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397484</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:08:25 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;And people wonder why our infrastructure is shot?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Sommelier</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397481</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397481</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:03:19 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Let&apos;s see, now... the Bush tax cuts for the super-rich save John &amp; Cindy McCain about $400,000 every year... so if the roof costs abouy $40,000,000 that means... hell... not even as much as a good-sized Park Ave. condo building saves would cover the cost, easily.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>edEx</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397478</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/07/01/no_retractable_roof_for_proposed_wt.php#comment-1397478</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:02:21 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;the city can&apos;t even get an escalator to work properly, they were actually thinking of a retractable roof?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>