Last week, the Reverend Al Sharpton announced he hired a former U.S. Attorney as the feds continue to investigate his National Action Network's finances. The announcement comes on the heels of many of his corporate donors being subpoenaed.
Last Sunday, the NY Post devoted a lengthy article suggesting the National Action Network, a non-profit dedicated to civil rights issues, had shaken down major companies, threatening protests if they didn't donate. Sharpton denied those allegations and issued a statement saying:
Though rarely do I hear anything new I must say I find it interesting that the New York Post, which is owned by NewsCorp, would claim that National Action Network "shakes down" corporations for contributions because they have been supportive of National Action Network in the manner described above. Newscorp bought two tables to our 2005 Martin Luther King, Jr. Dinner so they could further lobby against our mutual questioning of the fairness of Nielsen Companies new rating system. They even hosted a member of Congress at their table knowing that my public statements at the dinner would support our mutual position. Clearly they understand when they want to work with NAN and me but have some jaded view of when others do. In fact I recommend that IRS talk to NewsCorp first.You can read his full statement here.
Sharpton is also suspicious of the Justice Department, after he and his staff were given 6:30 a.m. "wake-up" subpoenas last December over their financials, and said that his new lawyer, former Brooklyn U.S. Attorney Zachary Carter, "knows the workings of that office and is totally aware of what is proper."
Today, as it happens, the Post reports how only two of the National Action Network's 36 chapters have filed as non-profits in the states they are in (some states only require registration if the organization raises over a certain amount, some require it no matter what).
Photograph of the Reverend Al Sharpton by mister mark davis on Flickr





I believe him. When do reverends ever lie? Other than Jimmy Baker, Jimmie Swagart, Jerry Falwell, Jesse Jackson and a host of others. Hmmm? do you notice most of the proceeding men of the cloth has a first name starting with the letter J.
That's it, I'm making popcorn.
Maybe Sharpton might get a return visit to the big house? We should be so lucky.
I have no love of Sharpton nor his bull-in-a-chinashop manner but methinks this smells a bit politically motivated. In a year when a person of African decent is leading in the polls for President of the United States, it doesn't surprise me one bit that they'd be going after someone who can turn out the vote.
I also wonder if they're not on some sort of fishing expedition trying desperately to tie Obama to Sharpton.
The Reverend Al was on a PETA program last night,
he was speaking against the treatment of chickens by KFC. he sure has changed since his days sitting on the subway rails and large medallions.
As Malcolm X said, "The chickens have come home to roost."
It's refreshing to hear a voice such as Bingo's in this forum. For too long the voice of prejudice has been sung too loud by all them white people that read and respond to this forum. Now we have the opposite point of view.
The only problem is nobility and the name Al Sharpton really doesn't fit that well together. Just ask Tawana.
Wouldn't it be funny if he was found to have embezzled $3,000 or something...still a felony and a jailable offense, but petty and stupid? A demeaning sum for a man who bloviates like a huge, gaseous Puffer Fish?
If Obama wins the Presidency and Sharpton is convicted and jailed, would the African-American community regard this as an very nice upgrade?
Remember: Unless he pleads guilty for a deal today, this would be a long-term process ending long after the 2008 elections.
My fantasy:
Angry companies decide to work together to deny Sharpton any money and give TWICE the amount to Katrina victims, United Negro College Fund, inner-city food banks, disabled African-American veterans, ect.