Gothamist: Video of the Day: Roses Get the Timelapse Treatment

sonyactivision

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:39:09 -0500

Filthy rose pornography needs to be taken off the internet. Shame on you, Gothamist for purveying this smut.

montag007

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:47:53 -0500

not a fan of the focus, was this done w/ a tilt shift? if it was they could have at least got the roses in focus, would preferred the shot @ f/8...

Kevin Walsh

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:39:07 -0500

Want more roses? http://forgotten-ny.com/SLICES/NYbotanical/roses.html

Rtea

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:23:57 -0500

Not as interesting to watch as the other one, but still pretty fun. The most interesting thing is the small focal range set in the middle, which makes it look like the entire thing is done on some miniature set with ant-sized people (like the Adult Swim spots).

Roger McDowell

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:45:23 -0500

Sweet

edEx

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:28:24 -0500

the cherry blossoms one is much better!

trotskie

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:59:11 -0500

Time lapse photography, however beautiful, is inherently malevolent. Anyone participating in its manufacture should kick some money towards a suicide hotline or spend a week volunteering in an assisted living facility. I'm going to go hug someone I love now.