Extra, Extra
Extra, Extra
Extra, Extra
Extra, Extra
Early Addition
For many people, the best part about watching hockey is the fights. For those fight-lovers, there's some rumbling between the Rangers and the National Hockey League that could interest you. Back in September, Madison Square Garden sued the NHL for antitrust violations, claiming the league monopolized team promotions via the Rangers' website.
Court papers filed yesterday included a letter from NHL commissioner Gary Bettman that asked the court to rule that the Rangers were in violation of league rules when they took it to court. Bettman claimed that breaking these rules could lead to disciplinary action, including terminating membership in the league. In order to terminate the Rangers, or force Cablevision to sell the team, 3/4 of league members would need to approve of the measure. Even if Bettman could garner the support of 75% of owners, forcing Cablevision out of team ownership would take years.
This does bring up an interesting question though, does the the NBA have a similar ability to terminate ownership?
Photo of NHL commissioner Gary Bettman by AP/Stephen Chernin
add to digg
add to stumble upon
add to reddit
email this
add to facebook
add to del.icio.us
"does the the NBA have a similar ability to terminate ownership?"
One can hope.
jay you beat me to it brother!
for what it's worth, that's what i was thinking when i wrote the post.
Can someone explain this to me... the league can terminate the Ranger's membership in the NHL or force the current owners to sell the team?
captainblackout: Those provisions are in the agreement that the teams sign with the league. The other owners have to agree, though, and they tend to look out for each other. Also, the league wouldn't terminate one of the original six so what we're really talking about is a forced sale, if it comes to that (and if the courts uphold the contract as legal).