Dubai Debt Issues Push Stocks Down
GMA: Adam Lambert, No; Chris Brown, Yes
Report: Wife Scratched Tiger Woods' Face, Chased His SUV; Update: Police Unable To Interview Couple Today
Family Gets Early Christmas Gift From Ellen DeGeneres
Street Artist Proposes on Subway Signage
Recently Metro examined the neglected transverse walls of Central Park. The transverses, the sunken crosstown roads designed by Calvert Vaux and Frederick Law Olmsted, "cut from schist, leaving rock outcroppings or stones set in rough-hewn walls" are crumbling before our eyes.
The walls, noted as "neglected and abused" in a 1989 Times Article, have had loose rocks fall onto 97th Street, so a company was dispatched to remedy the problem. However, community members found that a contractor was tearing down sections of the rock walls. Preservationists are rarely happy with piles of rubble, but an engineer estimated a full collapse of the walls being just "a winter or two away." The walls are under the jurisdiction of three city agencies, the Parks Department, Department of Transportation and the Department of Environmental Protection, which apparently contributes to lack of attention to the roads.
Last week city officials met with some of the preservationists to discuss the walls, and Metro reported back saying that promises were made to plant vegetation and "regroup before deciding how to restore the demolished walls." However, questions were raised about where the money would come from for preservation. Perhaps the Central Park Conservancy?
Photo via Metro.
add to stumble upon
add to reddit
tweet this
post to facebook
What does the old Times article have to do with this? About the only thing they have in common is that they talk about walls. But they're different walls altogether. The old article was about removing the low walls at the edges of the park, a simple discretionary aesthetic decision. The new article is about fixing the walls around the tranverse roads inside the park before they collapse, a matter of public safety and not something we can just turn away from.
because gothamist doesn't fact check and they don't check for grammatical errors.