June 10, 2008
Report Recommends Better Training, Non-Lethal Weapons to NYPD
The RAND Corporation issued the findings of a report that commissioned by the NYPD in the wake of the Sean Bell shooting. Among the recommendations were that the NYPD should incorporate more realistic scenarios into its firearm training and increase the number of non-lethal weapons carried by personnel on the street.
The report, started in January 2007, focuses on preventing incidents similar to the Bell shooting, where police officers fired 50 times. RAND identified what happened in that incident as "reflexive," or contagious, shooting, where officers unthinkingly just blast away based on incorrect information and the immediate feedback of hearing others shooting and bullets possibly ricocheting back at them. [Below, an image of the doctor's sketch detailing bullet wounds of Bell's friend Joseph Guzman.]
Out of all shooting incidents in 2004 through 2006, the report concluded 25 individual cases (5% of total police shootings) could have been avoided if officers had been provided with Tasers. The NYPD is immediately equipping about one in five sergeants on patrol with the non-lethal weapons.
The report also recommended general firearm training to include more realistic and confusing elements, like the sound of gunfire or people yelling something unsubstantiated like "He's got a gun!" RAND did note NYPD personnel's restraint in shooting incidents compared very favorably to other major police departments around the country.
However Commissioner Kelly said the study "was not a panacea; it wasn’t going to solve all issues as far as shootings are concerned.” The NYCLU agrees and wonders why the report lacks analysis of why police seem to shoot more at minorities, not to mention why the police seem to be firing more overall. The report's lead author apologized for not including race and ethnicity, calling it an oversight.




[ report this ]
No more tasers, please!
[ report this ]
So now we're asking officers to make a split decision on which weapon to reach for? What happens when the pick the wrong one?
The study suggests that 5% of shootings could have been avoided- were those 5% lethal shootings?
Something about this study gives me a bad feeling and I don't know why...
[ report this ]
Of the 25 shootings (5%) over 3 years mentioned in the RAND study, three resulted in fatalities.
[ report this ]
They don't mention how tasers are potentially fatal as well, should the tased have any sort of (possibly undiagnosed) heart condition. Why don't they keep the cops in shape and train em to do take downs the old fashioned way - with their bodies?
[ report this ]
Why don't they use dart and bean bag guns anymore?
[ report this ]
b/c plk because old fashioned methods isn't what violent people in 2008 resort to.
People with heart conditions should then especially listen when the cops say "PUT YOUR HANDS UP"
[ report this ]
because old fashioned methods isn't what violent people in 2008 resort to
And somehow a taser is going to stop someone with a gun from shooting a cop? Please. Taser stocks are down 12% even though police departments around the country are still buying them like up hot cakes. Someone's greasing this racket. Just ask the locals...
[ report this ]
Compared to other police departments, NYPD is very reluctant to use weapons. In Newark, car thieves are
shot if they try to elude police. Almost the same with Philly cops.
[ report this ]
I guess the Newark and Philly cops realize they aren't shooting at humans so they open up more.