<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: City Moves to Increase Construction Safety (Again)</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/06/05/city_moves_to_i.php</link>
<description>All comments for City Moves to Increase Construction Safety (Again)</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:44:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jen@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jen@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>dcsos</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/06/05/city_moves_to_i.php#comment-1378961</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/06/05/city_moves_to_i.php#comment-1378961</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:07:25 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I think the problem is they cannot really change the law for unexplained reasons.
Why else would you &apos;after the issue&apos;, place a safety monitor on a site with multiple
safety violations? This is wrongheaded thinking. Unless there is no way to actally get these uncooperative developers to remove violations before continuing to build on these unsafe sites.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>sonyactivision</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/06/05/city_moves_to_i.php#comment-1378791</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/06/05/city_moves_to_i.php#comment-1378791</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:59:10 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The city should also consider having a mobile morgue at every jobsite. The could even advertize Bloomberg&apos;s next &quot;initiative&quot; on the sides of the vans.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>