Got a Tip?
tips at gothamist
About Gothamist

Gothamist is a website about New York. More

Editor: Jen Chung Publisher: Jake Dobkin

About Us & Advertising | Archives | Contact | Mobile | RSS | Staff

Favorites
Newsmap
Contribute

Latest tip:

Is that NYC related? not covered anywhere else? get your own site and post irrelevant news [more]

 

Latest link:

 

Latest Photo:

 

Subscribe
Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Gothamist.

All Our RSS

June 4, 2008

St Vincent's: We'll Close if We Can't Demolish O'Toole

060408otoole.jpgIn presenting their argument for a massive demolition and construction project in the West Village – one that would raze the distinctive O’Toole Building (pictured) – representatives of St. Vincent’s hospital told the Landmarks and Preservation Commission yesterday that it will have to shut down if their proposal is not approved. Last month the commission unanimously rejected the hospital’s $1.6 billion development plan, which would demolish nine buildings to make room for a 329-foot-tall medical building on the O’Toole site and a 265-foot-tall luxury condominium in partnership with the Rudin Management Company.

According to the Times, lawyers for the hospital insist that “there is no other solution to this problem than to build on the O’Toole site. We can’t proceed if O’Toole remains.” St. Vincent’s executives are hoping to capitalize on a landmark-law exemption that lets non-profit institutions claim “hardship” in order to demolish old buildings. Yesterday they brought out a health care consultant to testify that St. Vincent’s is “obsolete” in its current state, and a structural engineer argued that retrofitting the O’Toole Building into a modern facility would be cost prohibitive and technically daunting.

A revised proposal, which would save four buildings from the wrecking ball and lower both the new hospital tower and the condominium by about 30 feet each, has won the approval of Manhattan borough president Scott Stringer and City Council speaker Christine Quinn. But community groups and preservationists still object to the scale of the proposal and want the O’Toole Building preserved as a significant contribution to Modernist architecture. No decision was made yesterday, and the commission planned another hearing for July.

Photo of O'Toole Building courtesy masnyc.

Email This Entry







Advertisement: Gothamist Continues Below!

Comments (9) [rss]

The question is: who are the ones responsible for landmarking this hideous building? It may be unique but that doesn't make a landmark.

 

The building is terrible inside. I don't really understand what people are thinking when they say they think it should be saved. It's ugly and very inefficient.

 

Brutalist crapitecture has got to GO!!!

 

Didn't we just go through this nonsense with that building at Columbus Circle? Someone really needs to reign in the preservationists. It's getting slightly ridiculous.

 

The ones who want to save it should just build a fake out of foam-core and they can take it with them.

 

The building is terrible inside. I don't really understand what people are thinking when they say they think it should be saved. It's ugly and very inefficient.

Because it's New York City. Everything is apparently perfect as is. Nothing can ever change.

It's charming, it makes us just like Boston.

 

The building is a waste of space. Unique maybe, but not practical or pretty.

 

That building should be preserved..to house all the community boards and neighborhood opposition groups. No more fitting fate.

 

Goodbye, too bad the Vatican would notsell a couple of artworks to help you guys stay.(laughter).
Perhap's we will get a hospital that approves of
safe legal abortion ,now in it's place.

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2008 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We use MovableType.

Site Meter