Gothamist: Teen Sex Book Calls Gawker "Despicable"

BongoBoy

Fri, 23 May 2008 20:15:31 -0500

So that's what happened to Bruce Wayne's youthful ward [wink wink].

EastRiver

Fri, 23 May 2008 00:23:20 -0500

humperdink humperdink Matty would be referring to "The Princess Bride" by Vladimir Nabokov.

Barbj8

Thu, 22 May 2008 18:14:29 -0500

That is a really ugly cover.

cmoney

Thu, 22 May 2008 17:52:06 -0500

Ok, Gawker can be despicable at times. But when they skewer crap like this, it's right on.

matty

Thu, 22 May 2008 16:46:29 -0500

I bet someone will compare themselves to humperdink humperdink of the 2000s

sonyactivision

Thu, 22 May 2008 16:41:58 -0500

Those "cool-looking,smart-looking hipsters" might be in for more than a PDF of this idiotic piece of unreadable shit. They might get the invite to 'certain cool parties' where 'certain hip things' will happen,coincidentally, in front of a camera. Bodysnatchers.

Ph

Thu, 22 May 2008 16:33:21 -0500

They should just put a big picture of Pedo Bear on the cover.

drewo

Thu, 22 May 2008 16:13:01 -0500

Because 50-year old men know so much about modern teenage sexuality.

JMH

Thu, 22 May 2008 15:49:12 -0500

Well... I mean, Gawker IS kind of despicable.

matty

Thu, 22 May 2008 15:14:31 -0500

Statutory rape is SO IN. I read it in the NY Times fashion section!