Quantcast

Bloomberg in Trees

2008_05_mbloombergtree.jpgIf you think a 66-year-old billionaire gets nervous about posing in trees for Time magazine's 100 influential people issue, think again!

The Post reports Mayor Bloomberg "happily" posed in a tree outside City Hall (he didn't climb - he got a ride from a cherry picker) and no "dive-bombing birds" were present. Naturally, there was a security guard was at the base of the tree. The only thing that's missing is a cute City Hall squirrel or rat!

Bloomberg's Time 100 write-up was penned by Robert Kennedy Jr., who applauds the mayor's PlaNYC effort to make the city more livable and sustainable. On a similar note, today Bloomberg said a gas tax break is "about the dumbest thing I've heard in an awful long time, from an economic point of view."

He told reporters, "We're trying to discourage people from driving and we're trying to end our energy dependence ... and we're trying to have more money to build infrastructure," which a gas tax break wouldn't help achieve.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • sonyactivision

    Apparently the mayor likes to hang out in a big crotch outdoors. George Michael beware!

  • schizofriendly

    He does, doesn't he, blablanyc? A little Quentin Crispy...



    It's the nicest photo of him yet and the tree is fabulous accoutrement.

  • blablanyc

    Bloomy looks fey.

  • Steven
    If our government was getting less money then maybe they could be more useful with the money they have instead of wasting it. Are you not capable of understanding the news? Since the Reagan tax cuts nearly 30 years ago, the Republicans have had NO PROBLEM spending money, multiplying the federal debt and passing the debt to the next generations


    Who said Republicans? I'm talking about the government as a whole.



    Say if we do finally cut our dependence on oil, what's going to happen to the oil companies? Will they let this happen?





  • ANGRYGOD11
    If our government was getting less money then maybe they could be more useful with the money they have instead of wasting it.
    Are you not capable of understanding the news? Since the Reagan tax cuts nearly 30 years ago, the Republicans have had NO PROBLEM spending money, multiplying the federal debt and passing the debt to the next generations.
  • Outter Burrougher

    While I disagree that people actually do want to spend more on gas, I do agree that they aren't generally helping themselves with the cars many of them are buying. I also agree that a gas tax "holiday" is an horrific idea both at the state and federal level (and is just a ploy for votes by certain of the candidates). This country really can't afford to have less money coming in, and if the state cuts gas taxes, I'm willing to bet it's just going to be asking the federal government for more money. We need to be slightly more concerned than we are regarding the huge debt we have and the fact that China is the one buying it. They will literally own us.



    Rant over.

  • interlard

    He's right about the idea of a gas tax break. Dumbest thing I've ever heard either.



    If people wanted to spend LESS money on gas they wouldn't be buying up these huge, dumb trucks that they have the nerve to call "SUVs". People want to spend MORE on gas. It's our elected leaders job to provide sensible alternatives.

  • thejuice

    "...a cute City Hill squirrel or rat?" City Hill? Jen Chung, I love the site but why are your posts always riddled with typos?

  • Steven

    If our government was getting less money then maybe they could be more useful with the money they have instead of wasting it.

  • Kevin Walsh

    One of the trees the MTA or DOT didn't cut down this year...



    www.forgotten-ny.com

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com