Got a Tip?
tips at gothamist
About Gothamist

Gothamist is a website about New York. More

Editor: Jen Chung Publisher: Jake Dobkin

About Us & Advertising | Archives | Contact | Mobile | RSS | Staff

Favorites
Newsmap
Contribute

Latest tip:

RealPlayer? I wouldn't touch that with a win95 machine. [more]

 

Latest link:

 

Latest Photo:

 

Subscribe
Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Gothamist.

All Our RSS

April 23, 2008

Mixed Reaction to Buildings Commish's Resignation

2008_04_lancaster2.jpgWith Patricia Lancaster's resignation as Buildings Commissioner after a series of high-profile construction-related fatalities and department snafus, the reaction is one of relief from some politicians while developers are sad.

Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer, who has been unhappy with the DOB for a while, said, "The time had come for new leadership at this department," and City Council member Jessica Lappin said, "I think it was appropriate and necessary...I want to thank her for being so honest and forthright over the last few weeks and for her service over the last few years - but given the challenges the department faces, I think it's appropriate to have some new leadership."

However, developers defended Lancaster; developer Douglas Durst said, "She did a terrific job in getting the department back on track." The Buildings Department has been notoriously corrupt; the Times pointed out an article from 1871 with the headline, "Disgraceful Corruption in the Department of Buildings" (the department accepted bribes). And Stringer did add, "The problem before us is not the making of a single person.”

The executive director of the AIA's NY chapter, Frederic Bell, told the Sun, Lancaster's resignation was a "travesty." Bell also said, "I don’t think anyone, even some of the people that are so rightfully concerned about development, think that New York should become a museum city where nothing gets developed and built."

Photograph of Bloomberg at Lancaster's swearing-in back in 2002

Email This Entry







Advertisement: Gothamist Continues Below!

Comments (2) [rss]

way to go out on a limb and point out corruption by citing an article from 1871 -

everyone is saying there is corruption - which I dont doubt but lets have some specifics

also I have a hard time thinking that a dob offical that loved by developers could've been doing her job all that well.

 

I find it absolutely shocking a developer came out and defended Lancaster.


I was being sarcastic btw

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2008 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We use MovableType.