Gothamist: Clinton for Governor? "Ridiculous," Says Spokesman

HowBoutDemCowboys

Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:15:29 -0500

"do we really trust someone who falls so quickly into fallacy to make logical decisions for our nation?" Check the last 8 years. Apparently some people do.

MJG

Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:13:02 -0500

So, you folks are upset that a politician has lied to us? Either Democrat - I voted for Hillary but I think Obama should/will be the nominee, will get my vote over McCain. But, don't get carried away by thinking Obama is much different than Hillary. How often does Obama bowl when the cameras are off? Really? That's the moral equivalent of Hillary's pub crawl.

Dirk

Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:14:58 -0500

I don't want her to be governor. She needs to go away and carpet-bag in some other state.

JMH

Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:04:33 -0500

Clinton has no interest in being governor because her entire association with New York has been one of convenience. Her goal has been to run for President all along and going from Senator to Governor would be a step away from that.

Reality Czech

Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:03:44 -0500

She'd be a better governor than president!

Tgirl

Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:44:15 -0500

"There are no circumstances under which Senator Clinton will run for governor" ok, file that under- "I just want to be your senator" "We had to dodge sniper fire coming in..." and, of course- "I did not have sex with that woman...:

matty

Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:33:59 -0500

Clinton doesn't want to be Governor because she doesn't want to move to Albany.

carl_sagan

Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:06:45 -0500

"gubernatorial" - It's not often that word can be used.

kingstonlounge

Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:58:56 -0500

Yeah, Senator Clinton is just like you and me. Snore. I don't care if she puts down a liter of Wild Turkey in a sitting, Clinton and her husband are $100-plus-millionaires. This is nothing more than a transparent attempt to relate to the blue collar "guns and religion" crowd that Obama supposedly slighted. Transparent too is the desperation of the Clinton campaign inasmuch as they keep harping on the "cling" because they cannot come up with a substantive attack - Obama misspoke. Clinton and her team have done something much more serious - they've proven, once again, that they are entrenched in business-as-usual mudslinging politics. The repeated suggestions that a single (admittedly ill-conceived) statement demonstrates a pattern of "elitism" is absurd at best and dangerous at worst; do we really trust someone who falls so quickly into fallacy to make logical decisions for our nation?