Update: Oreo, Dog Thrown Off Building, Was Euthanized
Access-A-Ride Renders Bike Lane Inaccessible
The UWS Gets Its Very Own Apple Store
Emily and Sarah Kunstler, Filmmakers
Video: Close Encounters Above Central Park?
Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling is testifying in a Manhattan federal courtroom this morning against a small publisher trying to release an encyclopedia based on her work. In the past, Rowling has been supportive of the fan-based websites that explore her novels, but when RDR Books announced last fall that it would be publishing a book version of the The Harry Potter Lexicon website, Rowling filed a lawsuit claiming copyright infringement.
Lawyers for RDR Books say the encyclopedia would “provide a significant amount of original analysis and commentary,” but Rowling’s attorneys say it’s "nothing more than a rearrangement" of their client’s popular book series, which have sold more than 400 million copies, led to a $4.5 billion film franchise, and given millions of grownups a purpose in life.
Rowling also argues that the Lexicon book would undermine plans to pen her own encyclopedia and give the proceeds to charity. However, a lawyer for RDR Books, Anthony Falzone, told the Times the Lexicon is part of a long tradition of literary commentary:
For hundreds of years everybody has agreed that folks are free to write companion guides. This is the first time that anybody has argued seriously that folks don’t have the right to do that.The controversy is causing a major rift in the Harry Potter fanbase; Melissa Anelli, who runs the Leaky Cauldron fan site, told the Times her board had voted to sever ties with the Harry Potter Lexicon site because of the lawsuit. Meanwhile, tickets to the Broadway production of Equus, in which Harry Potter’s Daniel Radcliffe gets naked as a jaybird, went on sale Saturday to Am Ex cardholders. (The show opens September 5th.)
Photo courtesy AP/Louis Lanzano.
add to stumble upon
add to reddit
tweet this
post to facebook
If she wins this I guess we won't see a Harry Potter for Dummies.
If she wins this I guess we won't see a Harry Potter for Dummies.
No, you could see a Harry Potter for Dummies, as long as that book is a "Cliff's Notes" style commentary or explanation on the books and doesn't just copy details from the books as the Lexicon did. There was a similar case in the 1990's when the producers of "Seinfeld" sued the publishers of a book called "The Seinfeld Aptitude Test". The publishers lost because the Seinfeld book just repeated details from the show, without making any commentary about them. Here is a wikipedia summary of that case. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_Rock_Entertainment%2C_Inc._v._Carol_Publishing_Group
A number of Harry Potter guides and parody books already exist and Rowling is completely fine with them. As mentioned, she's always been supportive of fan sites, too. If she's going after this particular one for copyright infringement, it seems to be justified.
MILF!
How would she fare on MILF Island?
Those eighth graders would go bonkers.
Big A/72
Point taken. Thanks.