Gothamist: Columbia Council DIDN'T Vote to Block Juicy Campus

anopneumous

Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:14:24 -0500

Also, Bwog is technically not a campus paper.

MFer

Sun, 23 Mar 2008 22:57:20 -0500

Can we stop using the word "punk'd", for fucking god's sake? It's so 2003. We can stop pretending that MTV or Asston Koocher is revelant anymore.

BorisM

Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:29:56 -0500

Hey guys, you need to do some fact checking. This did NOT happen and the Columbia College Student Council is not considering a ban any longer, I am not sure where you got this info.

dr zippy

Sun, 23 Mar 2008 19:30:15 -0500

Columbia is not censoring anybody, babymoron. A few career-minded undergraduates who've had their (now regrettable, but fun at the time) undergraduate exploits mentioned on JuicyCampus want the university to block the site. The university is obviously not going to do anything of the sort.

anopneumous

Sun, 23 Mar 2008 18:47:12 -0500

What kind of company would waste time searching JuicyCampus for information on job applicants? And who would bleieve the stuff that was written on there anyway? If I were rejected from a job because of a JuicyCampus post, I probably wouldn't want to work for that company anyway.

babyhitler

Sun, 23 Mar 2008 17:49:44 -0500

I find it hilarious that columbia always touts itself as one of the bastions of free speech and yet every single time it censors itself and makes the university full of hypocrites. They want only their messages of freedom. Such Bullshit! We need juicyalbany more than anything. Imagine if people knew about spitzer before he got elected none of this would have happened. Who watches the watchers?

Steven

Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:22:15 -0500

Students can just go outside of campus and find wi-fi hot spot or use a proxy.

dk87

Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:22:03 -0500

As much as I hate JuicyCampus this is a clear limit on free speech. However, as a private institution, I guess they have all the right to do what they want.