<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Tishman Speyer Out in Front on Hudson Yards Bid</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/03/22/tishman_speyer_1.php</link>
<description>All comments for Tishman Speyer Out in Front on Hudson Yards Bid</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 nyc_daveh</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:15:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>daveh@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>daveh@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>MT</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/03/22/tishman_speyer_1.php#comment-1323050</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/03/22/tishman_speyer_1.php#comment-1323050</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:30:29 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;At least this plan saves the  High Line. That&apos;s a huge bonus.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Think twice</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/03/22/tishman_speyer_1.php#comment-1319835</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/03/22/tishman_speyer_1.php#comment-1319835</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:12:15 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Why did the album include a photo of a rooftop garden at Rockefeller Center?

Ironically, I just came back from The Skyscraper Museum and it&apos;s exhibit New York Modern which prominently featured Rockefeller Center and it&apos;s rooftop gardens&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Toby von Meistersinger</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/03/22/tishman_speyer_1.php#comment-1319745</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/03/22/tishman_speyer_1.php#comment-1319745</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 22:52:36 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The Long Island Rail Road&apos;s West Side Yard (ie. what is there now) looks much better than any of these!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Spiny</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/03/22/tishman_speyer_1.php#comment-1319639</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/03/22/tishman_speyer_1.php#comment-1319639</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:18:47 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, maybe the sunlight is reflecting off the glass in all sorts of crazy angles...

That, or Tishman Speyer is also planning to build a Death Star and put it in orbit around the earth.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>dr zippy</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/03/22/tishman_speyer_1.php#comment-1319636</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/03/22/tishman_speyer_1.php#comment-1319636</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:56:52 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;why is the side of the Empire State Building facing us sunlit, when the sun is behind the building?  Are they envisioning a two-sun solar system?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Spiny</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/03/22/tishman_speyer_1.php#comment-1319626</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/03/22/tishman_speyer_1.php#comment-1319626</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:39:26 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Manhattan is becoming invisible! All the buildings are sky-colored! It&apos;s a bird, it&apos;s a plane...no! It&apos;s the reflection of both of those things on the side of a dehumanizing, violently ugly, transparent glass office tower and/or condo for the wealthy! What a contrast with the Empire State Building in the background.

I do not understand why architects and developers want to make the city&apos;s skyline look like a corny 1940s cartoon depiction of the year 2000. Buildings of...the FUTURE! Let&apos;s all wear sparkly tin-foil spacesuits with huge shoulder pads while we roam through the proposed park with our pet robots. We&apos;ll fit right in with the surroundings.

But more seriously, WHAT is that curvy, pointy thing on the right with the trees on it? It looks like it&apos;s covered in Braille.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>nonumentalart</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/03/22/tishman_speyer_1.php#comment-1319618</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/03/22/tishman_speyer_1.php#comment-1319618</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:20:49 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;this looks horrible and seems to serve the wealthy...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>SP</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/03/22/tishman_speyer_1.php#comment-1319610</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/03/22/tishman_speyer_1.php#comment-1319610</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:08:56 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Yay! More glass boxes for rich people!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>edgar</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/03/22/tishman_speyer_1.php#comment-1319609</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/03/22/tishman_speyer_1.php#comment-1319609</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:08:26 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I wouldn&apos;t have expected any better from the MTA, literally.  Choose the proposal that is the most architecturally uninspired, does the least to address NYC&apos;s housing crunch, and represents the worst in outmoded, inhuman 60&apos;s towers-in-a-park urban planning? Brilliant!

This proposal has the least apartments of any of the proposals, and has huge squat blockbuster towers that look like they came out of the 80&apos;s.  Look at the girth on those things.  Horrible.

That&apos;s the MTA for you.  Always disappointing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>