February 29, 2008
Doctors Without Borders
Earlier this week, Mayor Bloomberg announced a new plan to put health information of millions of New Yorkers online. He touted the initiative, "By bringing this health technology to New Yorkers, we are building a national model for a health care system that works... In Washington, they talk about how our health care system should be reformed; here in New York City, we are actually doing it."
Using $60 million of city, state, and federal funding, the City aims to provide physicians with computer software to better track patient medical information. By getting rid of the mountains of paperwork and dusty charts littering doctor's offices, the computer system will provide a centralized database of medical records including medical history, lab results, allergies, and medications.
The program will periodically remind overworked and/or absent-minded MDs about tests and duties that are routinely performed (ie. cholesterol checks, prescription refills). By giving a team of doctors who may be caring for a single patient access to the same information, the plan may make healthcare more efficient and prevent unnecessary repeat examinations and the prescribing of multiple medications that may lead to lower costs and prevent dangerous drug interactions and overdoses. Health Commissioner Thomas Frieden said, "By giving doctors and patients the tools to better manage conditions such as high blood pressure and high cholesterol, we can prevent thousands of strokes, heart attacks and early deaths."
So far, two hundred doctors caring for 200,000 or so patients have signed up, with a goal of 1,000 doctors involved by year's end. The City will also help pay for part of the service for docs who have practices where 30% or more of the patients are uninsured or on Medicaid.
New York City's movement towards electronic medical records is just one example of many such incentives across the country. Because of obvious concerns about patient confidentiality, while the Health Department will be allowed access to general medical data on how the City is doing, specific patient records will remain between them and their doctors.
Naturally, security and data theft remain a real concern with electronic medical record keeping - a lesson learned when a portable hard drive went missing from an Alabama veterans hospital about a year ago (the Veterans Affairs hospital system has been using an electronic records system for years to much critical acclaim from doctors and patients alike). And the ACLU has voiced worries about medical records becoming even more accessible to law enforcement agencies which are already allowed by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) to demand them without warrants.




Is the Doctors Without Borders organization involved with this project?
Can't wait until the lawsuits showing how this violates privacy shut this ill conceived plan down.
This has nothing to do with the organization "Doctors Without Borders." Just an unfortunate choice of headlines.
As for privacy considerations: this is a very real concern. The driving force behind this program, however, is a sincere desire on the city's part to insure all residents, insured or uninsured, rich or poor, get adequate preventive health resources and that those with chronic diseases associated with excessive use of health resources (asthma and diabetes being the big two) be monitored and that uniform standards of care be afforded to all, regardless of where they get their care.
I can't see privacy issues being any worse than they are now, with your insurance company and Big Pharma having access to supposedly protected health information about you.
This computer system was offered to selected private practices in NYC, as well. Initially marketed to private doctors as a way to step into the 21st century at little or no cost, the actual implementation of the program ended up scaring some of us away. It became obvious to some of us that the program would end up costing between $20,000 and $40,000, despite initial assurances that it would be free or low-cost. Most private practices are, however, realizing the need to computerize medical records and this might be the most economical way to do so.
clearly, centralizing patient information is an inevitability. The rest of the corporate and financial world is already managing information in this manner, and the same concerns (privacy, security, preservation) will apply. New initiatives and technologies require constant vigilance, and law makers and advocates need to engage the process to see that it is not abused or compromised. You can't stop progress, you must adapt and manage it.
This is an awful idea!!!
This is one of the worst examples of invasion of privacy.
"A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves."-Edward .R. Murrow
I can't believe that no one in the media is alarmed......oh, what was I thinking.
My doctor has to keep two sets of records for this two clinics, that are only two blocks away. For a technocrat like me, that is inefficiency beyond redemption.
A secure paperless office is the way to go.
This will make patients reluctant to ask questions or reveal certain information about their health.
Everything digital is hackable and lives forever....
what happens when the computers crash? and can't people hack into these records? to expose public persons?