William F. Buckley died in his Connecticut home today, at age 82. Some consider him the founder of modern conservatism, as he authored the seminal book in 1951 God and Man at Yale, in response to what he saw was an encroaching secularism at one of the nation's top universities, during what was considered one of the nation's most buttoned-down eras.
In fact, Buckley was prescient in foreseeing the social revolution of the 1960s. After publishing his first book as a 25-year-old, Buckley would go on to found National Review, a political magazine that served as a counterweight to established publications of the same genre like The New Republic. He even ran for mayor of New York in 1965 (Republican John Lindsay ultimately defeated Democrat Abe Beame).
Although not as frequently published as his liberal literary antipode, Gore Vidal, Buckley remained an active participant in what would become known as the "culture war." He and his wife, Pat, who died last year, were also active in NYC's social circuit. Their son Christopher became a successful author in his own right, lampooning the very divisions that his father highlighted. The National Review, which maintains its offices on the west side of Manhattan in the 20s, wrote today:
He retained his intellectual and literary vitality to the end; even in his final years he was capable of the arresting formulation, the unpredictable insight. He presided over NR even in his “retirement,” which was more active than most people’s careers. It has been said that great men are rarely good men. Even more rarely are they sweet and merry, as Buckley was.Here is Buckley's archive of National Review articles.





As smart and eloquent as Buckley obviously was, I'll always think he was part of the problem with this country and not the solution.
I miss Firing Line.
BTW, the National Review offices are at 215 Lex, not "...on the west side of Manhattan in the 20s."
Dave, by what measure was Buckley "not as frequently" published as Vidal?
political bent aside, Buckley was a critical thinker, not enough of those to go around.
I found him disturbing in the extreme, but had enormous respect for his intelligence. I also appreciated the fact that he held some surprising positions, such as being in favor of decriminalizing marijuana. Also, he was funny, which makes up for a lot.
Godless leftists like me are lucky there aren't more conservatives as smart and eloquent as he was.
I think "thenamesdave" is completely on point with Buckley and I wouldn't give Buckley the benefit of being called a critical thinker as illustrated by that famous 1969 debate between him and Noam Chomsky.
good riddance.
Surprisingly, Buckley ran on a platform of introducing bike lanes in New York City. Incredibly smart man.