Above, rendering of the proposed park; below, photograph of the site in its current state
A $114 million plan to put a waterfront park on the East River, just south of the United Nations, came into focus yesterday; the four-acre site is where a parking lot for a Con Edison power plant used to reside. City Councilman Daniel Gardonick said, "The opportunity to create this riverfront park is an opportunity we cannot afford to let slip away." The Municipal Arts Society renderings for the park envision a floating pylon in the river, featuring a restaurant, viewing platform, exhibition space and ferry landing.
The proposal, to be discussed at a City Council hearing next week, would be coordinated with developer Sheldon Solow's plan to build 6 apartment towers between 38th and 41st streets. The complex would be located on the other side of FDR drive from the proposed park, and Solow would have to give up a 30-foot wide sliver so the FDR could be rerouted away from the waterfront to pass underneath the park's deck.
Solow seems eager to accommodate, especially since he still needs City Council approval for his buildings (which have raised eyebrows as they would be taller than the 505-foot-tall UN Secretariat building). A spokesman for the developer told the Post: "We will certainly consider creating an easement and hope the City Council will agree that our project, including a new 5-acre park overlooking the river, will be a win-win for all New Yorkers." (With a few extra win-wins tossed in for Solow.)
Edward Rubin, co-chairman of Community Board 6's land-use committee, told the NY Times, “The East Side has been the poor stepsister of the West Side...The East Side had a lot of piers, industrial stuff, a highway right next to the F.D.R. Drive — and it’s very hard to connect to the waterfront." You can see the plan here at the Vision for an East Side Waterfront Park website.




Can we evict the UN and make that a park, too?
Rendering looks awesome though.
Is that a beach? No way right?
That said, anything to make the water a bigger part of the city is a ok with me. Think Sydney.
the rendering does look pretty cool...but we all know that projects never end up looking like their rendering.
cool, spectral skyscrapers.
It's easy to sell a nice open park when you pretend there are not big office towers casting dark shadows over it.
If there weren't the towers, there wouldn't be the money to build the park. Bryant Park has towers all around it and it's one of the most successful parks in the city. Don't be so fearful of those scary "dark shadows".
Waterfront park? Let's just build islands the shape of palm trees or of an atlas of the world!
Waterfront park? Let's just build islands the shape of palm trees or of an atlas of the world!
of course take down the power plant in manhattan - move it to brooklyn then build a park in manhattan - the 4 other boros get shafted every which way in this crap city...obviously I dont live in manhattan
Yes we don't have enough "luxury"buildings at inflated cost
in this city, let's compete with Dubai.
I prefer the parking lot over this ill-conceived plan. BLAH!