http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php All comments for DOH! NYC Condom Ad Uses Toronto Landmark en-us 2008 nyc_daveh Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:15:00 -0500 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss daveh@gothamist.com daveh@gothamist.com 60 http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1292851 http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1292851 Comments Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:43:00 -0500 <p>I also thought it was the Jefferson Market Library. Sloppy, lazy graphic design work like this makes me wonder what kind of moron gets cool gigs like NYC condom and I can't. Seriously, where do they find these people?</p> http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1292557 http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1292557 Comments Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:23:06 -0500 <p>That's what happens when you hire a graphic designer from friggin Iowa or some shit state to do your design work. Their whole reference of NYC is from the movies and TV so they can't tell Toronto from NYC. Not that Toronto is a bad city. It's actually quite nice.</p> http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1292249 http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1292249 Comments Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:44:25 -0500 <p>The graphic designer probably stock Googled "flatiron building" and the T.O. one came up. Good thing they didn't use the Flatiron Chicago building. </p> http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1292084 http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1292084 Comments Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:10:26 -0500 <p>toront-owned!</p> http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1292082 http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1292082 Comments Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:08:34 -0500 <p>gay guys don't use condoms. of course we do; have you ever seen a pregnant gay man? </p> http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1292083 http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1292083 Comments Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:08:34 -0500 <p>gay guys don't use condoms. of course we do; have you ever seen a pregnant gay man? </p> http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1292021 http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1292021 Comments Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:26:21 -0500 <p>My hometown!</p> http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1292012 http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1292012 Comments Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:22:33 -0500 <p>Is that imagination or do I see one guy kissing another? Isn't that perverted?</p> http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1292008 http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1292008 Comments Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:20:15 -0500 <p>the also put gay guys on the ad. gay guys don't use condoms.</p> http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1291999 http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1291999 Comments Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:14:55 -0500 <p>A make believe city? What... There is nothing in New York that can replicate the look of a city? Seems like more than one person was sleeping on the job (or perhaps they were 'gettin some'). </p> http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1291980 http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1291980 Comments Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:03:44 -0500 <p>The Flatiron Building isn't in the Village to begin with.</p> http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1291964 http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1291964 Comments Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:56:09 -0500 <p>That's one lazy graphic designer...</p> http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1291930 http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1291930 Comments Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:43:57 -0500 <p>Stock photography is cheaper in Canada.</p> http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1291928 http://gothamist.com/2008/02/14/doh_nyc_condom.php#comment-1291928 Comments Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:43:46 -0500 <p>I swear I was thinking Jefferson Market Library as well! It does look somewhat like it.</p>