Got a Tip?
tips at gothamist
About Gothamist

Gothamist is a website about New York. More

Editor: Jen Chung Publisher: Jake Dobkin

About Us & Advertising | Archives | Contact | Mobile | RSS | Staff

Favorites
Newsmap
Contribute

Latest tip:

RealPlayer? I wouldn't touch that with a win95 machine. [more]

 

Latest link:

 

Latest Photo:

 

Subscribe
Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Gothamist.

All Our RSS

February 10, 2008

800

Email This Entry







Advertisement: Gothamist Continues Below!

Comments (3)

Two niggling corrections.

1) Residents were grudgingly allowed in on a highly restricted basis to retrieve possessions still in their homes and offices. Many of us chose instead to expedite and assist the building's owner in complying with FDNY's and the City's daily growing list of required safety related repairs.

2) The necessity-- from a fire safety viewpoint-- of a working sprinkler system for our sort of building (required ONLY under recently passed provisions of the city's occupancy laws, and which could NOT have been demanded if a proper permit had been filed to remove the pre-war sprinkler system altogether) is therefore highly debateable.

What is not debateable is that banks and hotels routinely use the services of "fire guards" (hired out by specialized companies) if a sprinkler system installation runs behind schedule. According to one such company, one of their major clients was allowed to use fire guards for two full years during the period their building lacked a sprinkler system.

Accordingly, since a number of building residents have been certified by the FDNY as fire guards, AND we are more than willing to fulfill this requirement 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, we feel the city is acting unjustly and unreasonably in refusing to allow us to return during the sprinkler installation.

 

I'll tell you right now, the residents of 475 Kent would be in their building if not for Bloomberg & Scoppetta. They blamed the deutsche bank toxic wasteland on firemen doing insufficient inspection. This created a non-wavering stance in the FDNY, that any problem, small or big in a building was to lead to an immediate evac of the premises.

Don't blame the FDNY, they're just covering their asses so that bloomberg and scopetta can't use them as scapegoats again.

 

Our loft building circa 1870 is a wooden firetrap
too but all the LL had to do was put sprinklers
in the hallway so as we choke to death( a possibility for sure) from smoke, the hallway will still stand...Yay!
Airspaces in all the connected lofts "cockloft spaces" amazingly are not required to be sealed which would make these buildings burn in rapid fashion horizontally.
Firefighters dread having to fight fires in old loft buildings , I can't much blame them.

We also have kids in these so called "legal lofts"
which have a C of O at risk.
Merchants in these buildings that rent store space have no self control and their stores are filled top to bottom with combustible clothing and tons of paper boxes.usually near a furnance so creepy
that the Con Edison meter reader refuses to go in
these basements in by Community Bd, 5 NYC.

Some code enforcement!!Wheres the D.O.B.?
What makes this different than the Brooklyn artists loft is the height of our lofts
which are only 5 stories tall.And we make our lofts legal with the NY Loft board in 1985 or so.

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2008 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We use MovableType.