Real Estate Values Stagnate, Citigroup and Markets Stumble

citigroupbldg.jpgNew York City's Department of Finance is projecting that real estate values in the city will remain nearly flat this fiscal (ending September) year. More precisely, it expects only a 1.4% increase in property values, versus an 18% climb this past year.

It will be the slowest increment of growth since Mayor Bloomberg took office in 2002, during a real estate boom that enabled budget surpluses, tax cuts, and astounding growth in city spending. The surge in city revenue had been fueled by taxes on real estate transactions, but recently Mayor Bloomberg called for across the board belt-tightening at all city agencies back in September, acknowledging that a slowdown in Wall St. or the real estate market could badly impact New York's budget.

In a stark demonstration of how bad the real estate market is--nationwide and not just in NYC--Citigroup posted a fourth-quarter loss of $9.8 billion for 2007 and wrote down $22.2 billion in bad loans and mortgage-backed investments. The company is expected to cut costs by slashing approximately 4,000 jobs soon, with possibly thousands more layoffs in coming months. This week, Citigroup was forced to raise $12.5 billion in new capital by selling ownership stakes to investors including Singapore's Government Investment Corporation, among others.

And despite repeated assurances that it would not be cutting dividends, Citigroup, decided that it had to reduce payouts to shareholders by 41%, which further drained confidence in the company. On that news, the market continued its January decline on fears of more bad news from financial institutions, fuel costs, and concerns that retailers would bear the brunt of a downturn in consumer confidence.

Email This Entry


Comments (7) [rss]

But all the brokers told me that Manhattan will NEVER fall and guaranteed a double digit % growth every year? Could they be lying?

Great, so real estate values will stabilize. Will my landlord still find a way to jack up my rent by 10% next year?

Of course, his energy costs for the building will still be skyrocketing. Welcome to stagflation.

The day of financial reckoning is near.

This is good for prospective homeowners, however...since they control how much they're going to use for energy. Let the plummet go on, I say. I want get a house! :/

I wonder what will happen to rents if the college hiring season by the banks is low and coincides with large layoffs.

If I were a shareholder in Citigroup I would try to throw out the entire board. How much did Chuck Prince walk away with for essentially driving the bank in to the ground? I almost have more respect for Enron. Those guys were crooks. Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, Bear Stearns, etc. thought they were being really smart.

I guess it's time for Americans to immigrate to countries that are better off. Oh, the irony! Housing is pretty darn cheap in Montreal and I heard they pay pretty well too.

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

Get your daily dose of New York first thing in the morning from our weekday newsletter, now in beta.

About Gothamist

Gothamist is a website about New York. More

Editor: Jen Chung
Publisher: Jake Dobkin

Newsmap

newsmap.jpg

Contribute

Latest Tip:

Someone needs to go to art school - that is not a great picture in any way artistically or technical
[more]

Latest Photo:

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Gothamist.

All Our RSS