Mayor Bloomberg may be finding that coy flirtation can be cute at first, but quickly becomes old and aggravating if carried on for too long. The New York Times has a story today describing a growing backlash against a Mayor who seems preoccupied with something big, but it's something big that he won't discuss, or even acknowledge.
With the City on the verge of a fiscal meltdown and several controversial proposals like congestion pricing in the works, many New Yorkers are wondering why their Mayor is flying all over the country and the world stumping for a candidacy that he refuses to stake a claim to. The Times describes growing frustration across the political spectrum:
The political parlor game — Will he run? When will he decide? How much could he spend? — that has so delighted Mr. Bloomberg is suddenly sparking a backlash. Editorial pages from The Wall Street Journal to The New York Post, The Village Voice and The New Yorker have taken him to task. Members of the administration have been rolling their eyes and referring to Kevin Sheekey, Mr. Bloomberg’s political architect, as the deputy mayor for presidential politics.Even under oath, Mayor Bloomberg remains evasive. He was deposed yesterday in a lawsuit brought by a South Carolina gun dealer opposed to Bloomberg's multi-city anti-gun initiative. Asked whether he was running for President, Mayor Mike remained predictably cagey with his answers. "I was not planning to run for president then. I was never at that period of time — in the period I was instructed to be able to answer — considering running for president."
And when asked about his personal wealth, Bloomberg only conceded that he was a billionaire, but didn't elaborate. While being grilled, the Mayor admitted that he was glad he wasn't a lawyer. The opposition's lawyer noted "That might get you elected president." The Sun reports that Mayor Bloomberg simply smiled at the response.




I guess people are tired of Mayor Bloomberg's "will he" or "won't he" tricks, but I remember I was very tired of the 2008 candidates last year and now it's an exciting thing to watch and discuss. I think if we have some annoying candidates Bloomberg may be well-received.
I agree. It's annoying to New Yorkers, where the Mayor's coyness seems old hat because we have to read about it every day. To those voters not putting NYC politics under a microscope every day, he'll be able to burst onto the scene long after nationally prominent candidates seem stale and tired.
His wandering all over the place doing everything except his job (i.e. running NYC) is kind of like playing solitaire on one's computer at work - I'm beginning to get the impression if he had a ranch he'd be there cutting down some brush...
(...and yes I'm at work right now).
I actually thought this was old and annoying when it wasn't that old.
Bear in mind when voting: this is what happens when billionaires get bored...
I'll see your 100 mil and raise you 200 mil.
Run Mike Run!!
You got my vote.
Run Mike Run!!
You got my vote.
Here is my take— It is rare that you find a candidate that agrees with you on every single issue. But at the end of the day, the President is the executive manager of the world's most powerful enterprise, the US government. I believe most voter's underestimate the value of competence and management experience. What is most important to me is, do they have the competence and the experience to manage such an enterprise? Will they keep the economy strong? Will they make sound judgement in a crisis? Will they hire competent people, or just give valuable positions to unqualified individuals because they either have party connects or "owe" someone because of a campaign contribution?
This makes Bloomberg the right man at the right time.
His money buys him independence of a sort no other candidate can claim.
He doesn't look at decisions from an ideological point of view. He's very pragmatic.
Bloomberg knows how to manage money, and how to run a multi-billion dollar enterprise. He is competent, and has world class executive management experience.
The reality is, in our competitive society, the most talented among us do not often pursue positions in government, they pursue fortune in the private sector. To get the best of what is available to us, I wish to see a seasoned executive manager from the private sector in the White House.
This is what I see in Michael Bloomberg.
To read about others who would like to see Michael Bloomberg run for President, goto Run Mike Run:
http://www.RunMikeRun.com