December 14, 2007
Dumbing Down High School Classes Not Acceptable
Yesterday, the Daily News revealed that an East Harlem high school principal told teachers to effectively pass more students. Principal Bennett Lieberman's report card stated: "If you are not passing more than 65% of your students in a class, then you are not designing your expectations to meet their abilities. You are setting your students up for failure, which in turn, limits your success as a professional...most of our students ... have difficult home lives, and struggle with life in general. They DO NOT have a similar upbringing nor a similar school experience to our experiences growing up."
Teachers at Central Park East High School were offended, as were students. An 11th grader said, "Why are they going to let some pass who don't deserve it? It's not fair to those who want to work." But Lieberman said, "I pretty confidently stand by my words and don't expect my teachers to dumb things down at all. The goal is to find where a student is at and work with them from that point forward."
Today, the Daily News reports that superintendent Francesca Pena and Schools Chancellor Joel Klein voiced their concerns about Lieberman's memo and criticized, in a letter, how the "the impression, perhaps unintended, [was] that your staff should have diminished expectations for the students in your school and should ensure a 65% pass rate, whether warranted or not."
The News says it received the memo from a person who wanted to "expose that social promotion is very much a part of what teachers have to deal with, even though our mayor has said he's against it." Inside Schools' blog suspects that with the "pressure to improve performance," more incidents like this one and another in Staten Island where a teacher tried to artificially raise Regents exam scores will be seen.




I can actually kind of see this both ways. If 35% of your students flunk, it is possible that you think you are "upholding high standards" but are in reality doing something wrong. A good teacher evaluates where the students are at and goes from there - a bad teacher imposes some preconceived notion of how the class should go and sits back impassively while the students fail.
That said, the reference to "difficult home lives" etc. does seem to set the wrong tone.
Are the curriculum standardized across the board in all public schools throughout the city? If yes, then either the teachers are terribly horrible or the students are incredibly stupid/lazy/both. Which is it?
It's the latter. Having gone through the public school system here, I can tell you for sure that the kids ARE that dumb.
Really ... it's not like these kids were going anywhere of any significance in life anyway.
Really ... it's not like these kids were going anywhere of any significance in life anyway.
are you guys kidding? what city do you live in? how many thugs do you run into in the subway? those people "raise" kids.
being educated is "acting white" & special ed kids end up having special ed babies. that video of the girls beating up that guy is a perfect example of kids & their parents being the ONLY people responsible for their poor performance.
blame teachers all you want but they are not the problem.
Doesn't change the fact that they're dumb, #6. Of course it's the parents' fault.