
The NY Times is reporting that the Nets won't be playing in Brooklyn for the 2009-2010 season because the arena won't be finished until 2010. The Times attributes the delay to legal challenges.
The most publicized lawsuit is the federal case brought by 13 property owners and tenants. The suit alleges that the taking of their property via eminent domain was unconstitutional. In June, a US District Court judge dismissed the case, finding that the 22-acre, $4 billion Yards project qualified as a "public use," because of plans for housing, office space, and a sports arena, among others. Plaintiffs' counsel recently appeared before the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing before a three-judge panel for a trial to determine whether the project was awarded to confer a private benefit rather than for public use.
There are other suits. One, filed by community groups in state court, seeks to annul the state's environmental impact statement and begin the process anew. Another, also filed in state court, involves rent-stabilized tenants who argue that their rights as tenants were extinguished after their buildings were demolished following the state's use of eminent domain.
The tireless Norman Oder criticized the Times in October for reporting that the stadium would open in 2009. Oder predicted that "in the best-case scenario, the arena would open in [sic] for the 2010-11 basketball season."
Another issue surrounding the arena involves its proximity to the street. According to the City Room, the arena is planned for at least 20 feet from the street. In Newark, a new arena is the same distance from the street - and that leads to street closures during games for security reasons. A version of the blog post appeared in the Times print edition three days later.
In other Yards news, departing Deputy Mayor Daniel Doctoroff told the Observer this week that, on second thought, he would support a public review process for the Yards. "If it happened again, and the state were to ask if I would encourage them to take Atlantic Yards through the ULURP process, I would say yes," he said.




NIMBY idiots.
I think if the Nets were in NYC now, we bet more than a few aggravated Knicks fans would be thrilled to change allegiances. But as it stands, I'd be surprised if the Nets come by 2012.
Hopefully this monstrosity can be killed and the stupid basketball team can play in Newark where they belong. Anything that screws Ratner is good.
My one hope is that it doesn't take the same amount of time to kill the bloody thing as it did to kill the Westway.
Hopefully this monstrosity can be killed and the stupid basketball team can play in Newark where they belong. Anything that screws Ratner is good.
My one hope is that it doesn't take the same amount of time to kill the bloody thing as it did to kill the Westway.
Yeah, the idiots. Imagine not being willing to have your house pulverized into powder by a wrecking ball owned by a greedy slob of a developer. The fools.
The Nets suck, anyway.
unless the public is going to be allowed to freely enter the stadium - I dont see how it qualifies as being in the public good - taking peoples homes so somebody else can make money from the land - thats all it is
I have a perfect idea - they should replace the Knicks. No new stadium necessary!!
Alternatively, Kidd for Marbury.