
The New York theater world’s obsession with the almighty Times, which was once astutely likened to kremlinology, has often erupted in strong words about reviewer Charles Isherwood, whose opinion was recently derided as “antique snobbery” by TONY critic David Cote. So it was amusing to discover today that not only had the Times assigned the more mainstreamish Ish to review Fuerzabruta, the latest wet and wild spectacle from the people behind De La Guarda, but that he’d been forced to dance a little jig as well:
I am fiercely averse to audience participation, and discovered that my habitual routine for repelling the attentions of frisky cast members — tightly crossed arms, forbidding stare — was useless here. I was set upon by a small, feisty fellow who mocked (rather well) my glowering stiffness, grabbed me by the shoulders, and insisted I join the jumping throngs. I compromised with a hop or two, and he left me in blessed peace.
Unhand me, rapscallion, lest my cane find your backside! Since the Times dropped two juicy hype-pieces building up to Fuerzabruta's opening, their decision to send in the Ish – as opposed to a more frequent "downtown" critic like Jason Zinoman – may have been the Central Arbiter’s way of striking a wide “fair and balanced” stance. (Or did someone lose a bet?) The review is as funny as it is blasé, though Isherwood takes pains to point out that his taste and age group land him squarely outside the target market for the spectacle, harrumphing that the ideal audience for such diversions are “clubgoing, overstimulated college kids not worried about soiling their togs from H&M.”
So what’s it about? Like its predecessor De La Guarda, it’s not “about” anything in a narrative sense – think Cirque du Soleil on adderall. The extravaganza aims to actively engage the crowd with a whirlwind of flashing lights, gravity-defying acrobatics, confetti, pounding techno and aquatic escapades. That last bit is Fuerzabruta's much-ballyhooed pièce de résistance: watch in amazement as, inches above your head, a quartet of lithe ladies splash around in a puddle! It’s clear from the Times’s two lavish slide shows that Fuerzabruta makes for stunning photography, but at 70 declining dollars a ticket, does it make enough of a splash to warrant the neck-ache? If you’ve seen it, let us know in the comments.
Photo from ~ Raymond's Flickr.




I went with my daughters (ages 13 and 11) last Friday (half-price previews... nice) and we had a BLAST. The show is like your dream night out at a club, where the music is thumping and you can't stop smiling and people are doing insane, startling, beautiful things all around you.
For more:
http://scoboco.blogspot.com/2007/10/fuerzabruta.html
Isherwood also said that there only women in the pool; that was not the case the night we went.
No men in the pool? Perhaps they knew he was coming!
I studied experimental theater at NYU, and I still have trouble with actors touching or talking to me as an audience member. I did not see de la guarda's first show because of the fourth wall factor and I doubt I'll see this one, too. I guess I'm a curmudgeon, though unlike Isherwookd, I love experimental theatre, but like him, just don't touch me!
BTW, I enjoyed the Wooster Group's Hamlet last night at the Public.
@ Elderta - I'm on the same page as you (and Isherwood in this case) re participation and touching. I've even been put off when the house lights have been left up during performance - I think I'm most effected when a production lets me merge with the collective. That said, I really loved Tower of Babel at P.S. 122 and Bird Eye Blue Print, so it really depends on the approach. I saw Hamlet at St. Anns; if you caught that incarnation let us know if there are any changes since then.
Unfortunately, I didn't see it at St. Ann's. :(
Just trying to decide whether to go again...
I'm with Ish, I'm there to see the show, not be the show, unless they start paying me, too.
www.forgotten-ny.com
I have never seen anything like that show (I didn't go to De La Guarda). It was exciting and beautiful to watch. You really can participate as much or as little as you like. It is one of those "only in New York" type experiences.
I commented on this on my own blog, but I'll just save you all the click thru and say that I (being much younger and more adventurous than Isherwood) was appalled at the unpleasantness of the experience of seeing the show. From being violently shoved by a house manager to having the same experience of being forced to dance with one of the cast members, I found the show incredibly annoying. Add into the mix that it toys around with signifiers of totalitarianism and violence, and you get a pretty awful night for your $70.
What seems strange to me is that they sent someone who hates audience participation to see a show based on, you know... audience participation...