Quantcast

From Bartha to Bauhaus

2007_10_ewstb.jpg 2007_10_uestb2.jpg

The Landmarks Preservation Commission approved a modern design for a townhouse to be built at 34 East 62nd Street. The lot, just east of Madison Avenue, has been empty ever since Dr. Nicholas Bartha blew up his home, which seemed like an effort to keep his ex-wife from taking the home as part of their acrimonious divorce settlement.

The new design (rendering on right), by Preston T. Phillips, is a departure from the original townhouse, which was more traditional and was declared a landmark in 1981. CityRoom reports that the LPC approved the design 8 votes to 2, with LPC chairman Robert Tierney declaring, "The new building relates well to the streetscape and district through its proposed materials, scale, hierarchy and organization of facade elements." However, One of the opposing members said, “It’s a missed opportunity for good, modern design that isn’t hostile." Ouch.

The new design, which still has room for a driveway on the right, includes four bedrooms, conservatory, spa, waterfall, indoor pool, wine cave and geothermal heating system (at least as of an August plan). And the property is owned by Janna Bullock, who paid $8.3 million for the lot and told the NY Times she would resell it for $30-40 million.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Amanda Harletsch

    what about planting a little tree or something!

    this perennial industrial wasteland that is NYC is sooooo ugly, not like european cities.

  • Think2wice

    Could pass for a psych ward, detention center, or re-education facility.

  • TKaisen

    I assumed that:

    The new design, which still has room for a driveway on the right,

    implied there was plans to actually have a driveway.

    fyi: tough to put in a driveway due to the fact you'd need curb cuts in the sidewalk, which approvals are difficult. And 1 driveway also removes one street parking space permanently.

    Does anyone actually know what you have to do to GET permission to put a driveway in a townhouse?

    1 driveway removing 1 street parking spot seems to be fair, doesn't it? Especially if you park more than 1 car in there.

  • HughGass

    fyi: tough to put in a driveway due to the fact you'd need curb cuts in the sidewalk, which approvals are difficult. And 1 driveway also removes one street parking space permanently.

  • Pizza_Time

    Proof you don't need tase to be an Architect.

    "The new building relates well to the streetscape and district through its proposed materials, scale, hierarchy and organization of facade elements."

    Nice bullshitting for justification of its's ugliness and lack of style.

    Yes,... concrete relates well to the sidewalk, but that does not mean it actually looks good.

  • NW

    That isn't the final plan pictured - they revised it twice before it was approved. That diving board on the top floor has been pulled way back, the entry door faces the street and the giant planter is much smaller now. Tiny victories...

  • Elderta

    From Bartha to Bauhaus to Blech.

  • Jen Chung

    I think that the building's lot might not include the driveway - I suspect it's for the big building on the right?

  • TKaisen

    Why wouldn't you just put a garage where the driveway is going to be? It'd make all the other floors and the roofspace larger?

  • JoeSchumacher

    I like how the shadows on the rendering fall in three different directions. Will there be three suns?

  • Toby von Meistersinger

    It looks like a fire stair tower. Still it is better than anything by Frank Gehry or as I like to call him Frank Lloyd Wrong.

  • JGNY

    not bad, however check out his portfolio. He looks like the architect for Gordon Gecko types. Lots of splashy primary colors and faux finishes.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com