Quantcast

Battery Park City Redux?

batteryparkfill.jpgDeveloper Charles J. Urstadt, the man behind the creation of Battery Park City in the 1970s, is eager to duplicate the feat further north up the Hudson by creating an additional 40 to 50 acres of Manhattan real estate. How? Well, by depositing fill dredged from Lower New York Bay.

Urstadt estimates that the city could create land for $75 a square foot that could be worth $2,000 to $3,000 a square foot when developed as waterfront property. The 100 acres that comprise Battery Park City were created in a similar fashion using landfill excavated during the construction of the World Trade Center.

Critics deride the idea as silly, environmentalists as dangerous to river life, and Urstadt faces an uphill battle, but what he's proposing certainly isn't unprecedented. Most of modern Manhattan's waterfront was created by fill dumped into the Hudson and East Rivers. This map from a 2005 show called "Center of the World" illustrates how much of what we consider to be the normal dimensions of the island have changed over the last three centuries. Before 1970, the Hudson River came all the way up to West St. in lower Manhattan. "Secrets of New York" has an interesting segment on the history of Manhattan's expanding shoreline over the years.

Such waterfront reclamation projects aren't without risk. Relentless extension of the waterfront of Hong Kong––a city suffering from similar geographic real estate constraints and high property values––have made waterfront access extremely difficult for most residents and come at significant environmental costs. Recent studies have also shown what could be in store for waterfront NYC property in the event of a catastrophic flood, if global warming leads to higher ocean levels and more frequent flooding.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • glennQNYC

    Never gonna happen again IMO. I'm sure some group of enviro-tremeists will claim some sludge-slug or something's life will be effected.

    Land is relatively cheap over in Jerz...

  • who's living in all these new luxury buildings all of which are half empty?

  • Reality Czech

    I agree with Virgil.

    Start with the east river. Who needs it!

  • LinkMan

    The Harlem River isn't man-made, but it was man-moved. Hence Marble Hill (technically still part of Manhattan) is on the Bronx side of the river.

  • drewo

    Drewfucius says: Man-made islands with luxury housing to be popping up in New York harbor over the next 100 years.

  • Elderta

    Oh Matty, you Chicagoans are so cute when you try to be #1.

  • Dave Hogarty

    Come on, Corlears Hook is practically begging to be filled in and smoothed out. One of the other boroughs could poke an eye out on that thing.

  • matty

    if you fill in the harlem river you people won't be able to say that you're not a part of the USA anymore which will limit your repugnancy factor be a level of 12.

  • MT

    Isn't the Harlem River man made in the first place?

  • virgil

    I say we fill in all the rivers; living on an island is deeply humiliating for a city of our stature. The world is laughing at us. Fill in all the rivers, expand NYC to encompass Jersey City and Hoboken, annex New England, and bring back the feudal system.

    And lower the price of gas to 75 cents a barrel.

    These are my demands.

  • Jen Chung

    My favorite part of this article is when Urstadt suggests that the Harlem River could be filled since it's only used for the Circle Line. I hope he doesn't set his sites on the East River.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com