The current New York Magazine dives deep inside the navel with seven sprawling pages on Gawker. The rather tame procedural is conducted by Vanessa Grigoriadis, who's up front with the disclosures: Her NY Times wedding announcement was savaged by Gawker, New York Magazine currently employs two former Gawker editors, and Grigoriadis peeped managing editor Choire Sicha’s underwear.
So have the hunters become the hunted? Not really. The article is not so much a take-down as it is a thoughtful analysis of the turbulent waters roiling New Media and Old Media, as seen through the lens darkly of millionaire publisher Nick Denton’s flagship property – loved by some, despised by others, but read by all. In advance of a highbrow think-piece on Gawker in the next n + 1, it seems the anti-Gawker gripers are having their moment.
For those with sense enough to skip reading the whole thing, thereby sparing themselves an unshakable feeling of enervation sure to last through Wednesday, we’ve parsed a few of the low points:
- “We’re a drug ring, not a bunch of bloggers.” -- one unnamed Gawker employee.
- According to “satirist” Neal Pollack, Gawker writer Josh Stein “is an emotionally manipulative premature ejaculator with a Serge Gainsbourg tattoo on his back.” (Stein counters that only two of those things are true.)
- Everyone’s invited to Nick Denton’s Soho apartment for Halloween; the article featured a stalker-esque snapshot of the mogul, who refused to be interviewed but has posted a rejoinder on his personal blog.
Disclosure: We were somewhat recently hailed by Gawker as the 1010WINS of the blogosphere. (Also, we’ve slept with just about everyone in the Gawker Media Empire, in exchange for drugs, which we never received.) Let us know what you really think about Gawker and their smarty-pants commenters – rumble anyone? – in the comments. Your AccuWeather forecast and metro traffic report after the jump.





I've never read gawker and i'm not going to start now.
also the minute a magazine or whatever becomes more focused on documenting itself (media narcissism) I stop caring and you should too.
How does gawker even manage to speak with it's lips wrapped so lovingly around its own tailpipe, is what I'd like to know.
nick denton is one shiny motherfucker.
gawker comments are fun though, lots of good inside jokes. its more like a message board over there. idolator comments are great too.
depressing site. everyone there (especially the commenters) are pitiful hate spewing, self-absorbed, self-loathing people. I can't help but feel sorry for them. It seems the only emotions they have are hate and jealousy. It's kind of a shame.
I share most of the above sentiments regarding Gawker. I also dispute Gawker's characterization of Gothamist as the 1010WINS of Blogs. Clever, maybe, but isn't Gothamist more like a reader's digest of (mostly) old and (some)new media? And there's waaay less ads and repetition too. But yea, it's articles like this that get me to go to Gawker, only to kind of feel petty and directionless 10 minutes into it.
Yeah, Gawker is all those things. But like the name implies, sometimes you just can't look away. The posts on uber-douche John Fitzgerald Page last week were unsurpassed schadenfreude and actually sparked an interesting debate on libel and internet mob mentality.
Gawker. Kind of ridiculous sign of the times. This too shall pass.
They turned me on to I Can Has Cheezburger...
'nuff said