Ardito explained the Brooklyn Bridge's poor rating, "There's only components of the bridge that are in poor condition. They're actually the ramps leading to the bridge, not the span of the bridge. If the bridge was deemed unsafe, we would have to close it." The components of the Brooklyn Bridge in poor condition include "rusting steel joints...deteriorating brick and mortar on its ramps...roadway deck on the Manhattan and Brooklyn approaches."
Regular people had mixed opinions: Calvin Thomas told the Daily News, "You don't know how they maintain these bridges. I can't tell by looking at it but I'm sure even this bridge needs maintenance." On the flip side, Jennifer Cain mused to the NY Times, "I think because it's been up for over 120 years, [the Brooklyn Bridge has] got to be safe." And Joe Rainer said to the Sun, "I probably have a better chance at Atlantic City than falling off that bridge."
The Post has an article about infrastructure with an interesting quote from former DOT assistant commissioner Sam Schwartz (who also appeared on the Today show):
The [free] Queensboro Bridge, which should be used by 110,000 vehicles a day, is used by 150,000 vehicles a day, and those additional vehicles come from the Midtown Tunnel and from the Triborough Bridge, with no revenue stream to fix the Queensboro Bridge.
"It's been crumbling, and all our bridges have been crumbling, because there has been no revenue base. So it's been bad for us to have those extra 40,000 vehicles pounding the bridge with no revenue stream to maintain the bridge."
Schwartz also believes that that no more than 1% of bridges should be structurally deficient (the statewide average is 9%), "It’s too hard to monitor all those bridges with greater frequency.”
Jesus. With all the shrill fearmongers in this country it's amazing anything gets done around here. We're fucking scared of bridges now?
glennQNYC
Funding our military "stupid?" The only thing that is "stupid" is that comment!
guest
#4 should take a look at option 3 on the poll before spouting nonsense.
Maybe YOU should look at the long term growth of entitlements in this country and what percentage of the federal budget they represent versus the transportation budget. While the Bush tax cuts were ill advised especially with the war in Iraq the "surplus" projections of the Clinton years were ten year projections which conveniently ignored a looming recession in 2001 and more importantly stopped in 2010 which if you do the math is exactly the same year the first Baby Boomers turn 65.
guest
I love the Hank Scorpio episode of the Simpsons when he blows up the Queensboro Bridge and the UN guy says, "Maybe it just fell down on its own."
schmod
The media fails to mention that "structurally deficient" is a pretty broad-reaching definition that more or less means "it'll have to be replaced eventually," NOT that the bridge is in danger of collapsing.
This is sensationalism at its worst. The engineers don't even know what caused that bridge in Minnesota to collapse (it was inspected recently, and there weren't any major problems found with the structural integrity of the bridge).
A one-lane country bridge is considered "structurally deficient" because it can cause traffic jams, and isn't optimal for the flow of traffic. Even at that, there's nothing fundamentally unstable about a one-lane bridge.
guest
structurally deficient?!? I just bought the @&)#ing thing!!!11one
Reality Czech
Well, isn't this the kindof crap people pay tolls for?
JMH
Other than because it's been that way for a long time, I fail to see any reason why there shouldn't be tolls on the free East River crossings to pay for maintenance.
zodak
#4 should take a look at option 3 on the poll before spouting nonsense.
guest
(Isn't this the kind of crap we pay taxes for?)
No, you pay taxes for debt service, public employee pensions, public employee health insurance, and Medicaid. At the federal level, you pay for other senior services such as Social Security and Medicare. (In the suburbs, they also get schools).
guest
"It's been crumbling, and all our bridges have been crumbling, because there has been no revenue base. So it's been bad for us to have those extra 40,000 vehicles pounding the bridge with no revenue stream to maintain the bridge."
Isn't this the kind of crap we pay taxes for?
guest
I would believe the DOT as much as I would the tooth fairey delivering a winning ticket under my pillow.
guest
awesome- just the RAMPS leading up to the Brooklyn Bridge are deficient. That couldn't lead to any accidents, right?
Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Gothamist.
Want Gothamist's suggestions on what shows to check out, where to eat, what to buy, where to go for a quick trip? We'll be bringing you some exclusive tips and ideas via email every day! And don't worry—you'll still get a list of our top stories.
Sign up for Gothamist Daily, which will deliver useful tips—plus Gothamist's most popular stories—to your inbox at 11 a.m. This way, you'll be able to plan your week or month as well as catch up on Gothamist if you've stepped away.