Behind Warhol's Brillo Boxes

2007_07_arts_warholbrillo.jpgPrint Magazine has an article on the man behind the Brillo boxes Andy Warhol took out of the retail world and put in to the art world. As it turns out artist James Harvey created the design you see to the right, and when he walked in to Warhol's exhibit at the Stable Gallery on April 21st, 1964 - he saw it being displayed as art.

Harvey had designed the Brillo boxes when the company needed a package redesign three years prior. The abstract expressionist painter separated his commercial art work from his real art, where Warhol integrated the two. Warhol was also a commercial artist at the time, and was much sought-after in New York...by 1959 he was making an $100K a year from it!

Warhol famously recognized these consumer objects as the most elemental creations of our society. By refusing to separate fine art and commerce, Warhol, who had also been a commercial artist during the ’50s, turned Harvey’s Brillo box into Brillo Box. In the book After the End of Art, the philosopher and art critic Arthur Danto asks, “What distinguishes Warhol’s Brillo Box from the Brillo boxes in which Brillo comes?”

While Harvey laughed it off, the Graham Gallery (who represented his work) sent out a press release stating “It is galling enough for Jim Harvey, an abstract expressionist, to see that a pop artist is running away with the ball, but when the ball happens to be a box designed by Jim Harvey, and Andy Warhol gets the credit for it...What’s one man’s box, may be another man’s art.” That day at the gallery Warhol was selling the autographed Brillo Boxes for $300, a serigraph of one is on eBay right now for $1600. After the jump is a video of him being interviewed about the pop art scene, while surrounded by the boxes...

Email This Entry


Comments (6) [rss]

user-pic

I like these Brillo Boxes, but I really think that Warhol gets way too much attention, and way too much credit ..

Like most Pop artists he had a few interesting ideas, then just recycled them over and over again just to extend his career, and make more money (IE : Johns, Rausenberg, etc )

Dont most artists in their heydey recycle their ideas over and over again to extend their careers?

Andy Warhol was a product of his time, and I think a large part of his fame now involve an admiration of his sheer audacity at getting away with things.

The fact that he was actually quite a brilliant illustrator and conventional artist makes his fame as a pop artist even more interesting.

user-pic

I'd agree with Gregorie - Warhol isn't the first artist to stick with a style for a long time.

I don't think that Warhol is as simplistic as he's often assumed to be, though - there's a lot more to his art than just soup cans and silkscreens.

user-pic

Whether he was a brilliant illustrator or even whether he was a good artist is just a matter of opinion..

My point was after his heyday he more or less became what he was making fun of, and ended up becoming Warhol the business

user-pic

Poor James Harvey. Even in the comments section of Gothamist, it's all about Andy Warhol. The actual article, if you bothered to click through, is pretty melancholy and thought-provoking.

user-pic

Thanks for Pointing out the obvious Adam

Yes, the article is about James Harvey and Andy Warhol

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

Get your daily dose of New York first thing in the morning from our weekday newsletter, now in beta.

About Gothamist

Gothamist is a website about New York. More

Editor: Jen Chung
Publisher: Jake Dobkin

Newsmap

newsmap.jpg

Contribute

Latest Tip:

Symphonic rock comes to Manhattan in December! Seann Branchfield and the Unnamed Band performing De
[more]

Latest Photo:

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Gothamist.

All Our RSS

Follow us