Gothamist is a website about New York. More
Editor: Jen Chung Publisher: Jake Dobkin
About Us & Advertising | Archives | Contact | Mobile | RSS | Staff
Most Recommended:
Topless Day in Central Park (20)
Benjamin Van Leeuwen, Ice Cream Man (19)
Angie Pontani, Reigning Queen of Burlesque (18)
What Was Going on in Madison Square Park Yesterday? (8)
Most Commented:
Topless Day in Central Park (60)
NYPD Defends Ejecting Sox Fan from Yankee Stadium During "God Bless America" (58)
Hillary Clinton Says Barack Obama "Must Be Our President" (49)
Latest Migration Trend: Buffalo, NY (46)
Latest tip:
Bianca Jagger/Michael Jackson fight rent stabilization in NYC. <a href="http://cityroom. [more]
Latest link:
[from jenchungsboobs] Podcast: The Mayor, on His Terms - City Room - Metro - New York Times Blog
Latest Photo:
Pearl Oyster Bar sucks. I can't believe people actually line up before the 5 PM opening. The lobster roll should be called a mayonaise roll. The only way to get a seat at a table is bribe the maitre de a minimum of $20 otherwise you get the 8 inch wide counter with backless stools. Joy.
Well, Ed's right in one respect - it'll just draw more attention his lobster bar.
Commenter #1 obviously hasn't been there in years. First off, they open at 6pm for dinner. I went there at 5:30 on a Friday and there was a small line, and was seated immediately after doors opened. Plenty of tables now that they have the space next door. The lobster roll was good, but the steamers were simply killer.
"where chefs and owners are just scratching the surfact" ???
I believe that the picture is of Ed's lobster roll. The fries at Pearl are thinner.
So does Rebecca Charles want to receive a royalty for each roll sold by Ed's? I don't think that Pearl could sell more lobster rolls even if Ed's made significant changes to the style and substance of his rolls. Both places, and indeed other popular lobster roll restaurants are quite crowded both at lunch and dinner.
Perhaps it's time for an open source lobster roll.
it's pretty well established that one cannot copyright recipies. one might copyright a book of recipies, but the idea itself, of how to make a dressing, etc. is not protected by copyright law.
#6-I thought the whole purpose of copyright was to protect original ideas (i.e. original recipes) including their derivatives. However, if she doesn't lose any business over it, whats the damage?
Most people (including Tim Zagat) know that the food and decor is only part of the equation. What about service? What about location? Even if both places look exactly the same, they still have the ability to differentiate themselves to appeal to different clientele.
Anyway, if she was a good businesswoman and so concerned about her ideas being stolen/copied, she should have made her employees sign confidentiality and/or non-compete agreements.
sorry *typo*- food and decor ARE only part of the equation
I've been to Pearl Oyster bar twice and I have to say that the seared scallops are AMAZING. However, the service has been terrible both times. They really need to work on that.
#7, copyright (and limiting it) is also (arguably) about encouraging creativity by allowing for derivatives. When copyright gets to stringent, creativity suffers. Or at least that's how I tend to see it.
Also, she's almost certainly not losing much if any business over this. Let the better chef prevail.