Quantcast

Preservationists Win Sunnyside Gardens Landmarking

2007_06_sunnysidegard.jpgThe Landmarks Preservation Committee unanimously approved designating Sunnyside Gardens a landmark. However, amNew York reports that the preservationists who supported the measure were outnumbered by residents of the Queens enclave. One expressed dismay by saying, "It's going to cause a lot of problems for the low-income people We are disappointed. This process is not a democratic system."

It was a heated issue: The LPC said it received "hundreds and hundreds" of letters with opinions on the matter. Opponents to landmarking the 77-acre argued that landmarking the area, originally developed for working class families, would prove costly and tedious for homeowners, who would only be able to make improvements or changes with approval from the landmarks committee and would be required to use certain materials. But preservationists, like the Sunnyside Gardens Preservation Alliance, wanted to maintain the area's spirit as an early planned garden community. LPC chair Robert Tierney said, "I think Sunnyside Gardens epitomizes the notion of a special sense of place," and that the LPC would not ask residents to reverse changes already made.

Now the City Council needs to sign off on the designation. City Councilman Eric Gioia who supported the landmarking said he would ask for tax breaks and residential parking permits to offset home improvement costs and loss of parking spaces (because some cars have been illegally parking on front lawn space). And check out this NY1 image of an elderly, anti-preservationist resident holding up a sign.

Photograph Sunnyside Gardens Park by wallyg on Flickr

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • guest

    why again does the analogy fail?? inquiring minds wish to understand the deluded mind.



    just kidding.

  • guest

    clothing > housing



    stupid analogy

  • guest

    zodak,



    it's actually worse than being a caretaker, because a museum caretaker is both paid to do his job, and the upkeeping expenses are not coming out of his own pocket.



    guest @ 1:19PM



    wouldn't it be grand if everyone walked around in coattails and tophat again-- you wouldn't mind if some officious busibodies passed a law dictating what period style your neighborhood residents should adorn, right?

  • guest

    why do so many people not care for preserving the few beautiful things left in this city?



    has society become so that tasteless?

  • zodak

    it's outrageous that a small # of losers have imposed their will on the majority of the homeowners, now they are just caretakers for a large museum. i'm so sick of everything being named a landmark.

  • Toby von Meistersinger

    The problem with landmarking people's homes is that it really prevents them from making improvements to their homes without jumping through hoops and paying extra money to have historically accurate things. If people want other people's homes preserved they should at least pony up some money for it or more radically buy what they want to preserve, otherwise mind your own business. I am all for preservation, as long as the only people who get screwed are developers and not the little guy.

  • guest

    Bad.

  • guest

    good

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com