Lawsuit Against Dry Cleaners Rivets the Nation

2007_06_dryclean.JPGWhile there are many trials in NYC that quickly become media circuses, we're breathless about an insane lawsuit that has gone to trial in Washington DC because it involves a service very familiar to New Yorkers. An administrative law judge Roy Pearson is suing his dry cleaners for millions of dollars after they lost his pants (he says; they say they have his pants, but he just doesn't want to claim them). Pearson originally tried to sue for $67 million, claiming that Custom Cleaners violated consumer protection laws, and somehow his $54 million lawsuit made it to trial.

Yesterday, the Post noted how Pearson cried on the stand, "as he recalled a missing pair of trousers from his blue and maroon suit." This is how the NY Times, which headlines its article "Judge Tries Suing Pants Off Dry Cleaners," explains the dispute:

Judge Pearson says in court papers that he owned exactly five suits, all Hickey Freemans, one for each day of the workweek. But the waistlines had grown “uncomfortably tight.” So he took the suits to Custom Dry Cleaners, in a strip mall in gritty northeast Washington, for alterations.

When the owners, Korean immigrants who came to America in 1992, could not find one pair of pants, Judge Pearson demanded $1,150 for a replacement suit. The owners did not respond; he sued.

Using a complicated formula, Judge Pearson argues that under the city’s consumer protection law, the owners, Soo and Jin Chung and their son, Ki Chung, each owe $18,000 for each day over a nearly four-year period in which signs at their store promised “Same Day Service” and “Satisfaction Guaranteed.”

After being sued, the Chungs offered to settle, for up to $12,000, but Pearson appeared to believe he could become a crusader for customer rights and the lawsuit headed to trial. The Chungs' lawyer, Christopher Manning, suggests that Pearson's divorce and financial woes - not to mention weight gain - played a role in the lawsuit, saying, "The plaintiff has decided to use his intimate knowledge of the District of Columbia laws and legal systems to exploit non-English-speaking immigrants who work in excess of 70 hours per week to live the American dream."

Pearson, who is representing himself, said in his opening statement, "Never before in recorded history have a group of defendants engaged in such misleading and unfair business practices." This is why Washington media is liveblogging the trial; the Washington Post's Marc Fisher wrote about Soo Chung's testimony:

Indeed, back in 2002, when there was a problem with one of Pearson's pants, Custom cut him a check for $150, the replacement value of the garment. The Chungs took Pearson at his word that that was what he would have to pay for new pants; he never produced a receipt for the replacement purchase, nor did the Chungs even ask him for one.

But the Chungs subsequently asked Pearson to take his business elsewhere; the encounter with the customer was difficult enough that the family decided to ask him to find another dry cleaners where he might be happier with the service. But Pearson protested, asking the family to let him return to the fold of customers at Custom, in part because it was so convenient to his house, but also because he had been a satisfied customer. The family relented, a decision they surely rue today.

Pearson, though, did not cross-examine Chung, who cried during her testimony describing the toll the lawsuit has taken on her.

The trial wrapped up its closing arguments yesterday and the judge will give a verdict next week. The judge presiding, Judge Judith Bartnoff, said of consumer protection laws, "This is a very important statute to protect consumers. It's also very important that statutes like this are not misused." Naturally, trial lawyers are worried that the case will damage their reputations. And the Chungs' lawyers have a description of the Chungs' side of the story on a website. There's also a fund to help the Chungs with their defense costs.

Here are some tips about finding a dry cleaner. And have you had any good or bad experiences with your dry cleaner?

Photograph of natural dry cleaning by Rukii on Flickr

Email This Entry


Comments (16) [rss]

Pearson should be disbarred. What a crock: the dry cleaner offered him a reasonable settlement and he is going for the jugular. That poor Korean couple: can't they just get a break?

As Shakespeare said, "The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers."

user-pic

Roy Pearson was up for re-election or something similar. Does anyone know if he got it?

I want a million because my dry cleaner ripped a shirt.

Roy Pearson is a piece of garbage.

user-pic
Naturally, trial lawyers are worried that the case will damage their reputations.
Uhhh, because it WILL. Because the case is INSANE.

That said, if I hear that Shakespeare quote taken out of context one more time, I'm gonna go nuts.

Even I am asking "why is this on Gothamist" for this one. Gothamist has got to figure out a way to explicitly brand itself as "New York stuff plus whatever random stories we find entertaining."

user-pic

Maybe someone should sue an industry that actually deserves it - like the airline industry. No one is more egregious on their flouting of consumer rights than than the airlines. It's beyond outrageous what they get away with. Who else can make a customer pay hundreds of dollars to make them sit on a plane on a tarmac for hours and hours with no repercussions whatsoever?

user-pic

#6:
why don';t you sue gothamist for non nyc stories. loser.

user-pic

This attorney is truly garbage. A mean-spirited person.

On the other hand, I agree about the airline comment. Last Thanksgiving, an airline lost a large piece of my luggage. I painstakingly gathered all of the required receipts; didn't "fib" or exaggerate by a penny. For my trouble, I received about 30 cents on the dollar as compensation. I guess I should have just tripled my claim.

#9 what have yoiu learned here?

the rule of thumb in life is: lie.

indeed, the douchebaggery of pearson is at critical levels and this news is partially relevant since i'm korean. however, like bklynd said, what is this doing here when there is a DCist...

user-pic

On top of the stupidity and outrage of this lawsuit, how does a rabid mental case/power abuser like Pearson even get considered for a post as an Administrative Law Judge? Oh...I forgot, it's our gov't at work...

user-pic

When I saw this on the News, I thought the plaintiff was Marion Barry.

user-pic

Do they have the Baker act in Washington DC? That sounds like the way to go. This judge is a danger to himself and others. He is clearly insane. The defense should demand a physiatrist examine him. For those of you that don’t know. The Baker act is when a person is put away in a mental institution when they are considered crazy!

user-pic

As you are undoubtedly aware, a $54 million lawsuit was recently brought in DC District Court against a small neighborhood drycleaners over a pair of alleged lost trousers. While the Court found resoundingly in favor of the business owners, Jin and Soo Chung, their ordeal is not yet over—they have drained their saving accounts contesting this frivolous lawsuit, and they have racked up over $100,000 in legal expenses.

In order to help the Chungs defray their legal bills, ILR and the American Tort Reform Association are co-hosting a fundraiser on Tuesday evening, July 24 at 6 p.m. at the US Chamber Building in Washington, DC. Unfortunately, businesses large and small across America must deal every day with similar extortionist tactics from some plaintiffs’ lawyers. The collective outcome is not justice, but lost jobs, ruined businesses and billions of dollars in lost economic opportunity. Additional details, sponsorship opportunities and easy online registration are available at www.chungfundraiser.com.

user-pic

Please take some brief action to get this bloodsucker off our payroll at over 100K per year. You know this fat, lazy cat does very little every day except for milking everything he can out of the system. Unethical and immoral people (not to mention crack smokers) have a way of staying in DC govt jobs somehow. Pearson fits this DC profile to a tee but we must let them know the taxpayers don't agree.

Send a note to DC Mayor Fenty of your opinion:

Adrian.fenty@dc.gov

More govt. contacts and more follies of the bloodsucker:

http://victimsoflaw.net/JudgeRoyPearson.htm

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

Get your daily dose of New York first thing in the morning from our weekday newsletter, now in beta.

About Gothamist

Gothamist is a website about New York. More

Editor: Jen Chung
Publisher: Jake Dobkin

Newsmap

newsmap.jpg

Contribute

Latest Tip:

Those Mariachi guys piss me off when you enter a mostly silent subway car.
[more]

Latest Photo:

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Gothamist.

All Our RSS

Follow us