June 12, 2007
Next Stop, Grand Central Terminal, as MTA Lowers
Tunnel Boring Machine

Yesterday, the MTA lowered the first of many parts of the Tunnel Boring Machine into the lower level of the 63rd Street tunnel as part of the MTA’s East Side Access project. The lowering itself could have been dismissed by passersby as just some sort of generic routine construction work, but it was much more than just moving a boring machine. When finally assembled in about two months, the 600-ton automated Spanish-owned and Italian-made machine will dig its way beneath the streets of Manhattan the tunnel that will finally bring the Long Island Rail Road into Grand Central Terminal.
The 63rd Street Tunnel itself began in 1969 with the plan for trains from the IND Queens Boulevard line to use the upper level hooking into the 6th Avenue IND in Manhattan, while the LIRR would use the lower level. The tunnel was completed in 1976, then laid dormant until 1989 when a short stub of the F train service was added serving Lexington Avenue–63rd Street, Roosevelt Island and 21st Street-Queensbridge. Finally in 2001, the F train was linked into the Queens Boulevard line after over thirty years on the drawing board. By the time LIRR trains start rolling through the tunnel will be over forty years old.
Later this summer, work on the 3.5 mile long tunnel under Manhattan will be going on 24 hours a day and the vibration from the digging will be monitored since they will be digging through hard rock. One thing we don’t know is where the material dug out will go, since that is up to the contractor. It is a pretty safe bet that it won’t be dumped into the Hudson or East Rivers to create more land for Manhattan as was done with part subway tunneling (the debris will probably wind up in a landfill instead).
According to the president of MTA Capital Construction Mysore L. Nagaraja, the whole East Side Access project for the LIRR will give a 50% increase in capacity for the railroad and can shave twenty minutes off the commute when finished in about 2013. The cost for all this is a pretty steep $6.8 billion, with money coming from the federal and state governments, not including the original cost of building the 63rd Street tunnel in the 1960s.
Two fun facts: When witnessing the lowering of the machines, there was a safety briefing that was pretty much wear a hard hat, eye protection, and an orange vest - and don't fall in the big hole. And the Tunnel Boring Machines will probably be left underground.
Photographs by Toby von Meistersinger




With a little bit of luck our great-great-great grandchildren might be able to ride through the East Side Access tunnel on its opening day.
It certainly is shameless that this project is well underway while the SAS is still spinning its wheels - for how many years now?
The Second Ave Subway is a far more technically challenging endeavor (Not to mention ALOT more expensive) than this project. I'm not surprised how easy this project went through.
We're going to need a SAS after this is completed. The 6 will be even more miserable with the addition of LIRR commuters to the Grand Central fray.
From Jen Chung: Well, this project got a federal boost first because it serves state and airport issues - and because Pataki was behind it. Don't worry, I think the MTA is committed to the SAS. For now, at least.
I'm delighted to these projects moving. Seems incredibly wasteful to bury the boring machines though. Even selling for scrap beats digging a machine grave and walling it in.
they should have hired Bash and the drill from Ocean's Thirteen... would have got the job done in half the time and without using any union labor.
Great photos Toby, kudos to you.
Anyone who needed to be told, at the safety briefing, not to fall into the big hole should go ahead and fall into the big hole as far as I'm concerned.
QUOTE: "One thing we don’t know is where the material dug out will go, since that is up to the contractor. It is a pretty safe bet that it won’t be dumped into the Hudson or East Rivers to create more land for Manhattan as was done with part subway tunneling (the debris will probably wind up in a landfill instead)."
No way the debris will end up in a land fill. That ground earth will most likely be sold as anything from fill, to topsoil.
I was just going by what was being said at the site, but the disposal of the debris is up to the contractor and the landfill option was mentioned.