June 1, 2007
Wall Street Journal Inches Closer to News Corp. and Murdoch
The owners of a controlling interest in Dow Jones & Company, Inc. may be considering a move to sell the company to Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. When the news that Rupert Murdoch was interested in acquiring The Wall Street Journal and adding all of Dow Jones to his News Corp. media empire, we wrote about the potential reluctance of the majority owners of the acquisition––the Bancroft family––and their longheld view that family ownership of a newspaper insulated it from profit-related concerns and guaranteed editorial independence. We also noted that $5 billion is a lot of money and the New York Times columnist David Carr predicted that Rupert Murdoch's past successes in wooing reluctant sellers, coupled with the disparate and disinterested ownership, would result in Murdoch's eventual triumph.
WNBC is now reporting that the Bancroft family is willing to meet with Murdoch and discuss the sale of Dow Jones & Co. This is not completely unexpected. Carr predicted that the vast wealth of News Corp. can ultimately prove irresistable to family members who grow away from the business that they were uninvolved with anyway, and the share price of Dow Jones never really retreated from the heights it reached following the announcement of Murdoch's bid, so the market seemed fairly convinced the family would sell.
Murdoch is promising that if he assumes control of The Wall Street Journal, it will continue to have editorial independence and would be open to setting up an independent oversight board to assure it. News Corp.'s chief recently weathered some attention over a gossip page embarassment over accusations that the New York Post's Page Six staffers took cash from story subjects and that Murdoch himself pressured the Post to write favorably or restrain from criticizing his business partners.




I don't want Murdoch to own the WSJ only because I don't like Murdoch. Otherwise, I can't see what he would do to it. Push it more to the right? Impossible. Nor can I see him making it more like the NY Post--the primary readers of the WSJ wouldn't like that.
Not that a power-mad Oz-hole like Murdoch wouldn't give the WSJ a complete makeover, but what would be the point?
The WSJ's op-ed page is certainly somewhere-leaning, but it is an independant entitiy, whether one likes it or not. Also, the Journal's newsgathering entity is generally considered unimpeachable in its integrity. And the page-one feature writing at the Journal is of a quality that's hard to march anywhere else. I think the general objections to Murdoch purchasing the paper is that it would lose its credibility as an independent voice, and possibly become a shill for Murdoch's large and varied interests.
Rupert Murdoch scares the living daylights out of me and I can't believe that the WSJ would retain editorial independence and integrity if he got his money-grubbing hands on the paper. Frankly, the WSJ is a bit too conservative for me already, but I can't imagine what would happen is Murdoch is able to purchase it. Mr. Murdock needs to spend the rest of his life enjoying his wealth...and maybe, spreading some of it around...and leave the WSJ to do what it already does best. I urge the Bancroft family to resist selling their paper to this old vulture.