http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/14/there_is_nothin.php All comments for Sweeping the News en-us 2007 jen Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:08:15 -0500 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss jen@gothamist.com jen@gothamist.com 60 http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/14/there_is_nothin.php#comment-1092677 http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/14/there_is_nothin.php#comment-1092677 Comments Tue, 15 May 2007 07:23:08 -0500 <p>Sorry to be knocking your sponsers, but "Are they fit for war" as 'high road' journalism? Am I the only one who thinks this is pretty sexist? Is anyone really asking this question? I thought we got over this issue a long time ago. What's next, "Women out of the kitchen, should we let them?"</p> http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/14/there_is_nothin.php#comment-1092606 http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/14/there_is_nothin.php#comment-1092606 Comments Mon, 14 May 2007 21:01:47 -0500 <p>There was no quid-pro-quo and I would have said the same thing if another station took the high road without having a sensationalist pandering story. If they had one, I would have said so and said they were pandering to the lowest common denominator.</p> http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/14/there_is_nothin.php#comment-1092585 http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/14/there_is_nothin.php#comment-1092585 Comments Mon, 14 May 2007 20:23:20 -0500 <p>"WNBC 4 had a very good series helmed by veteran consumer reporter Roseanne Colletti looked into the problem of identity theft." --Is that an observations, or a quid-pro-quo since your site has been chosen by WNBC as one to advertise on? New media, old media, Same Old Spit. </p>