<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Focusing on Cameras</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/12/focusing_on_cam.php</link>
<description>All comments for Focusing on Cameras</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:08:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jen@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jen@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Toby</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/12/focusing_on_cam.php#comment-1091613</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/12/focusing_on_cam.php#comment-1091613</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 02:19:26 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I am guessing that Dave is talking about the Digital Rollei which isn&apos;t a true twin lens reflex (TLR), since it just uses one lens for imaging and one for looks, and it is only a 2.0 megapixel camera.

A lot of people are using old TLRs for Through the Viewfinder digital shots.
It may be a bit of a clunky setup, but you can come up with a device where you can gaffers tape on a a 6 megapixel point and shoot and get some better results then the little fashion accessory Rollie.
Now if someone could make a real digital TLR, that would be superb. I am sure there is some technical minded person who would have enough courage and know how to mate a digital imaging sensor onto an old TLR in place of film and wire it up to fire.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Harris</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/12/focusing_on_cam.php#comment-1091546</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/12/focusing_on_cam.php#comment-1091546</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 20:11:20 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I never leave the house without my Canon SD 700 IS. It has an optical image stabilizer and always performs above my expectations. 

I have lots of other cameras, better ones, but most of my photos are taken with this one because it&apos;s always there. It weighs 6.9 oz. by the way.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>hashashin</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/12/focusing_on_cam.php#comment-1091541</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/12/focusing_on_cam.php#comment-1091541</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 19:51:30 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry if I missed something obvious, but what camera are you referring to in the first paragraph?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>