Got a Tip?
tips at gothamist
About Gothamist

Gothamist is a website about New York. More

Editor: Jen Chung Publisher: Jake Dobkin

About Us & Advertising | Archives | Contact | Mobile | RSS | Staff

Favorites
Newsmap
Contribute

Latest tip:

http://in.sys-con.com/node/710532< [more]

 

Latest link:

 

Latest Photo:

 

Subscribe
Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Gothamist.

All Our RSS

May 9, 2007

City Deals Trump Winning Hand to Build in Soho

2007_05_trumpsoho.jpgWe guess the power of Donald Trump can thwart even ghosts of people buried in the lot where he wants to build a yooge condo-hotel. Trump's Soho project was finally approved by the city yesterday afternoon. The Daily Intelligencer calls it the "last huff of Soho's industrial grit," and spoke to the Trump Soho critic, Andrew Berman of the Greenwich Village Society for Historical Preservation, who had fighting words: "This is a case of the city not enforcing its own laws, and that makes them vulnerable to a lawsuit."

The laws in question are the ones that allow Trump to build a 41-floor tower: The building is not residential, but "transient," where people can buy units in the building, but can only use their for 120 days a year (and not more than 26 days consecutively). Still, people think the building's approval is an egregious example of taking advantage of a loophole that allows transient hotels to avoid public review.

However, one business manager nearby tells am New York, "Bring it on. This area is crap. It's a bunch of old, run-down buildings and parking lots. People just wrap themselves around the concept of historical preservation. But here it's a parking lot opposite another parking lot."

When you go to the Trump Soho website, it clearly states, "The proposed condominium units may not be used for residential occupancy. They may only be used for transient occupancy and for no other purpose."

30

Email This Entry







Advertisement: Gothamist Continues Below!

Comments (5)

Berman and Goldstein of DDDB should date each other.

 

I remember when transients couldn't afford multi-million dollar properties in SoHo.

 

who the fug is going to over see the law that people can buy units in the building, but can only use their for 120 days a year (and not more than 26 days consecutively)?

Give me a break. Another law which will be totally ignored by the city all in the interests of $$$$$$.

Sickening.

 

who the fug is going to over see the law that people can buy units in the building, but can only use their for 120 days a year (and not more than 26 days consecutively)?

Give me a break. Another law which will be totally ignored by the city all in the interests of $$$$$$.

Sickening.

 

I agree with Sickening. Once the building is built, the damage will have already been done. What's the city going to do when (if?) they find out people are actually living there, make them tear down the building? Yeah, right. Score another win for rich pigs like Trump.

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2008 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We use MovableType.

Site Meter