http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/new_york_wins_b.php All comments for New York Wins Big at National Magazine Awards en-us 2007 jen Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:08:15 -0500 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss jen@gothamist.com jen@gothamist.com 60 http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/new_york_wins_b.php#comment-1084949 http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/new_york_wins_b.php#comment-1084949 Comments Wed, 02 May 2007 17:03:58 -0500 <p>I agree with 3. New York is middlebrow at best, and panders to the worst materialistic and voyeuristic aspects of our town. Always feel like I ate a whole bag of greasy potato chips after I read it, whereas I feel like I've learned something interesting after reading a New Yorker piece. NY Mag does have good design though...</p> http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/new_york_wins_b.php#comment-1084795 http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/new_york_wins_b.php#comment-1084795 Comments Wed, 02 May 2007 15:08:43 -0500 <p>New York is the paper equivalent of MTV News. Pure trash.</p> http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/new_york_wins_b.php#comment-1084779 http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/new_york_wins_b.php#comment-1084779 Comments Wed, 02 May 2007 14:50:56 -0500 <p>Call me shallow, but I've always preferred New York to the New Yorker. The latter always felt stuffier to me. Sort of like the difference between National Geographic and the old Scientific American, which could bore me to tears at times.</p> http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/new_york_wins_b.php#comment-1084732 http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/new_york_wins_b.php#comment-1084732 Comments Wed, 02 May 2007 14:06:45 -0500 <p>"stiffer more severe" You had to go there, didn't you?</p>